Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-2-318 (2026)

Third party beneficiaries of warranties express or implied

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A seller's warranty whether express or implied extends to any person who may reasonably be expected to use, consume, or be affected by the goods and who is injured by breach of the warranty. A seller may not exclude or limit the operation of this section.

Source: L. 65: p. 1312, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 155-2-318.

Editor's note - Colorado legislative change: Colorado changed "natural person who is in the family or household of his buyer or who is a guest in his home if it is reasonable to expect that such person may" to read "person who may reasonably be expected to".

4-2-319. F.O.B. and F.A.S. terms. (1) Unless otherwise agreed the term F.O.B. (which means "free on board") at a named place, even though used only in connection with the stated price, is a delivery term under which:

(a) When the term is F.O.B. the place of shipment, the seller must at that place ship the goods in the manner provided in this article (section 4-2-504) and bear the expense and risk of putting them into the possession of the carrier; or

(b) When the term is F.O.B. the place of destination, the seller must at his own expense and risk transport the goods to that place and there tender delivery of them in the manner provided in this article (section 4-2-503);

(c) When under either paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection the term is also F.O.B. vessel, car, or other vehicle, the seller must in addition at his own expense and risk load the goods on board. If the term is F.O.B. vessel the buyer must name the vessel and in an appropriate case the seller must comply with the provisions of this article on the form of bill of lading (section 4-2-323).

(2) Unless otherwise agreed, the term F.A.S. vessel (which means "free alongside") at a named port, even though used only in connection with the stated price, is a delivery term under which the seller must:

(a) At his own expense and risk deliver the goods alongside the vessel in the manner usual in that port or on a dock designated and provided by the buyer; and

(b) Obtain and tender a receipt for the goods in exchange for which the carrier is under a duty to issue a bill of lading.

(3) Unless otherwise agreed in any case falling within subsection (1)(a) or (1)(c) or subsection (2) of this section, the buyer must seasonably give any needed instructions for making delivery, including when the term is F.A.S. or F.O.B. the loading berth of the vessel and in an appropriate case its name and sailing date. The seller may treat the failure of needed instructions as a failure of cooperation under this article (section 4-2-311). He may also at his option move the goods in any reasonable manner preparatory to delivery or shipment.

(4) Under the term "F.O.B. vessel" or "F.A.S.", unless otherwise agreed, the buyer must make payment against tender of the required documents and the seller may not tender nor the buyer demand delivery of the goods in substitution for the documents.

Source: L. 65: p. 1313, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 155-2-319.

4-2-320. C.I.F. and C. & F. terms. (1) The term "C.I.F." means that the price includes in a lump sum the cost of the goods and the insurance and freight to the named destination. The term "C. & F." or "C.F." means that the price so includes cost and freight to the named destination.

(2) Unless otherwise agreed and even though used only in connection with the stated price and destination, the term "C.I.F. destination" or its equivalent requires the seller at his own expense and risk to:

(a) Put the goods into the possession of a carrier at the port for shipment and obtain a negotiable bill or bills of lading covering the entire transportation to the named destination; and

(b) Load the goods and obtain a receipt from the carrier (which may be contained in the bill of lading) showing that the freight has been paid or provided for; and

(c) Obtain a policy or certificate of insurance, including any war risk insurance, of a kind and on terms then current at the port of shipment in the usual amount, in the currency of the contract, shown to cover the same goods covered by the bill of lading and providing for payment of loss to the order of the buyer or for the account of whom it may concern; but the seller may add to the price the amount of the premium for any such war risk insurance; and

(d) Prepare an invoice of the goods and procure any other documents required to effect shipment or to comply with the contract; and

(e) Forward and tender with commercial promptness all the documents in due form and with any indorsement necessary to perfect the buyer's rights.

(3) Unless otherwise agreed the term "C. & F." or its equivalent has the same effect and imposes upon the seller the same obligations and risks as a "C.I.F." term except the obligation as to insurance.

(4) Under the term "C.I.F." or "C. & F.", unless otherwise agreed, the buyer must make payment against tender of the required documents and the seller may not tender nor the buyer demand delivery of the goods in substitution for the documents.

Source: L. 65: p. 1314, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 155-2-320.

4-2-321. C.I.F. or C. & F. - "net landed weights" - "payment on arrival" - warranty of condition on arrival. Under a contract containing a term "C.I.F." or "C. & F.":

(1) Where the price is based on or is to be adjusted according to "net landed weights", "delivered weights", "out turn" quantity or quality, or the like, unless otherwise agreed the seller must reasonably estimate the price. The payment due on tender of the documents called for by the contract is the amount so estimated, but after final adjustment of the price a settlement must be made with commercial promptness.

(2) An agreement described in subsection (1) of this section or any warranty of quality or condition of the goods on arrival places upon the seller the risk of ordinary deterioration, shrinkage, and the like in transportation, but has no effect on the place or time of identification to the contract for sale or delivery or on the passing of the risk of loss.

(3) Unless otherwise agreed, where the contract provides for payment on or after arrival of the goods, the seller must before payment allow such preliminary inspection as is feasible; but if the goods are lost, delivery of the documents and payment are due when the goods should have arrived.

Source: L. 65: p. 1314, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 155-2-321.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1976–2024 · leading case: DREAM FINDERS HOMES LLC, a Florida Ltd. Liab. Co., & DFH Mandarin, LLC, a Florida Ltd. Liab. Co., & v. WEYERHAEUSER NR Co., a Washington Corp., & Cross-Appellee., 506 P.3d 108 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021).
DREAM FINDERS HOMES LLC, a Florida Ltd. Liab. Co., & DFH Mandarin, LLC, a Florida Ltd. Liab. Co., & v. WEYERHAEUSER NR Co., a Washington Corp., & Cross-Appellee., 506 P.3d 108 (Colo. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 6× “THESE LIMITATIONS WILL APPLY TO ALL CLAIMS, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTY, CONTRACT, INDEMNITY, TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE), STRICT LIABILITY[,] OR OTHERWISE. ¶ 77 Although Homes and Mandarin were not parties to the distribution agreement, they are nonetheless bound by…”
Hiigel v. Gen. Motors Corp., 544 P.2d 983 (Colo. 1976). · cites it 6× “Remedies in the instant situation are better left to the UCC warranty provisions, specifically section 4-2-318, C.R.S. 1973, which extends warranties to "any person who may reasonably be expected to use, consume, or be affected by the goods and who is injured by breach of the…”
Forest City Stapleton Inc. v. Rogers, 2017 CO 23 (Colo. 2017). · cites it 7× “§ 4-2-318, C.R.S. (2016) (adopting Alternative B in Uniform Commercial Code § 2-318); see also § 4-2-102, C.”
Persichini v. Brad Ragan, Inc., 735 P.2d 168 (Colo. 1987). · cites it 5× “Under section 4-2-318, 2 C.R.S. (1973), "[a] seller’s warranty whether express or implied extends to any person who may reasonably be expected to use, consume, or be affected by the goods and who is injured by breach of the warranty.”
Fiberglass Component Prod., Inc. v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc., 983 F. Supp. 948 (D. Colo. 1997). · cites it 6× “In Colorado, “to the extent that [a] contract of sale contains provisions under which warranties are excluded or modified, or remedies for breach are limited, such provisions are equally operative against beneficiaries of warranties____” § 4-2-318, C.R.S., Comment 1; Wenner…”
Am. Saf. Equip. Corp. v. Winkler, 640 P.2d 216 (Colo. 1982). · cites it 6× “Comment d to section 402B provides: "The liability in this Section is liability in tort, and not in contract; and if it is to be called one of `warranty,' it is at least a different kind of warranty from that involved in the ordinary sale of goods from the immediate seller to…”
Lease Fin., Inc. v. Burger, 575 P.2d 857 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 3× “" Section 4-2-318, C.R.S.1973. Since the cause must be remanded for further proceedings by the trial court on other issues raised on this appeal, it should also make findings as to whether implied warranties were present in the sale between Cowell Sales and Lease Finance,…”
Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Sys., Inc., 813 P.2d 736 (Colo. 1991). · cites it 2× “The Konishis and Weed claimed damages against AOSHPI for the death of and injury to their cows pursuant to section 4-2-318, 2 C.R.S. (1973), which provides that warranties extend to any person "who may reasonably be expected to use, consume, or be affected by the goods and who…”
In re Conagra Foods, Inc., 90 F. Supp. 3d 919 (C.D. Cal. 2015). “2d 1309 (1977) (“lack of privity no longer presents an obstacle to recovery for breach of implied warranty,” citing Colo. Rev.Stat. Ann. § 4-2-318 (“A seller’s warranty whether express or implied extends to any person who may reasonably be expected to use, consume, or be…”
Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc., 684 P.2d 187 (Colo. 1984). “Petri had drawn this information from a review of Robins’ literature, conversations with Robins’ representatives, and the Davis article.”
Hawkinson v. AH Robins Co., Inc., 595 F. Supp. 1290 (D. Colo. 1984). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs also assert that Robins breached implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose to give rise to claims under C.R.S. §§ 4-2-314 and 315.”
Pust v. Union Supply Co., 561 P.2d 355 (Colo. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 2× “However, § 4-2-318, C.R.S. 1973, provides: "A seller's warranty whether express or implied extends to any person who may reasonably be expected to use, consume, or be affected by the goods and who is injured by breach of the warranty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.