Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 4
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-2-601 (2026)

Buyer's rights on improper delivery

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subject to the provisions of this article on breach in installment contracts (section 4-2-612) and unless otherwise agreed under the sections on contractual limitations of remedy (sections 4-2-718 and 4-2-719), if the goods or the tender of delivery fail in any respect to conform to the contract, the buyer may:

(a) Reject the whole; or

(b) Accept the whole; or

(c) Accept any commercial unit or units and reject the rest.

Source: L. 65: p. 1327, § 1. C.R.S. 1963: § 155-2-601.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: Cissell Mfg. Co. v. Park, 36 P.3d 85 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cissell Mfg. Co. v. Park, 36 P.3d 85 (Colo. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 4× “Section 4-2-601, C.R.S.2000. As discussed, once a buyer accepts goods, he or she is precluded from rejecting them, § 4-2-607(2), C.”
Rocky Mountain Microsystems, Inc. v. Pub. Saf. Sys., Inc., 989 F. Supp. 1352 (D. Colo. 1998). · cites it 2× “(g) Like any buyer, Defendant also had the right to reject non-conforming goods (C.R.S. § 4-2-601(a)) so long as Defendant seasonably notified the Plaintiff, i.”
W. Conf. Resorts, Inc. v. Pease, 668 P.2d 973 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “The applicable subsections of the Uniform Commercial Code provide that the buyer may reject goods that fail to conform to the contract within a reasonable time after their delivery or tender.”
Mari v. Wagner Equip. Co., Inc., 721 P.2d 1208 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “, regardless of the status of the modifications, because passage of title upon delivery under this section is based on the seller’s final commitment to identification of specific goods to the contract by the act of making the delivery. The buyer, at his option, may accept…”
Banghart Props. v. Colorado Mills (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). “See § 4-2-601(a), (c). Any alleged modifications to the contracts through the course of performance could not contradict the clear written terms of the contract.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 4-2-601(a) — 3 cases
Rocky Mountain Microsystems, Inc. v. Pub. Saf. Sys., Inc., 989 F. Supp. 1352 (D. Colo. 1998). “(g) Like any buyer, Defendant also had the right to reject non-conforming goods (C.R.S. § 4-2-601(a)) so long as Defendant seasonably notified the Plaintiff, i.”
W. Conf. Resorts, Inc. v. Pease, 668 P.2d 973 (Colo. Ct. App. 1983). “The applicable subsections of the Uniform Commercial Code provide that the buyer may reject goods that fail to conform to the contract within a reasonable time after their delivery or tender.”
Banghart Props. v. Colorado Mills (Colo. Ct. App. 2025). “See § 4-2-601(a), (c). Any alleged modifications to the contracts through the course of performance could not contradict the clear written terms of the contract.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.