Colo. Rev. Stat. » Title 40
Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102 (2026)

Lease provisions - definitions - rules

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Leases between motor carriers or contract carriers and independent contractors may contain, but need not be limited to, the following provisions:

(a) (I) The independent contractor, working with a certificated taxi or limousine carrier, may either lease a motor vehicle owned by the certificated carrier or may own the motor vehicle and lease it to the certificated carrier, who may release the vehicle to the independent contractor.

(II) The independent contractor, working with a certificated common carrier or contract carrier, other than a certificated taxi or limousine carrier, may own the motor vehicle and lease it to the certificated carrier.

(b) The lease may require the independent contractor to be instructed in the method of the carrier's operation, and to be familiar with federal, state, and municipal statutes, ordinances, and regulations. The lease may further require the certificated carrier or contract carrier to enforce compliance with such federal, state, and municipal statutes, ordinances, and regulations by the independent contractor. Compliance with the provisions of this paragraph (b) shall not affect the status of the independent contractor as an independent contractor for purposes of this article.

(c) The lease may provide for the transportation services to be accomplished personally by the independent contractor.

(d) The lease may provide for uniformity, on the body of the motor vehicle being used, of color and any written displays.

(e) The lease may provide for periodic driver safety training.

(f) The lease may provide for some control over any assistant working with the independent contractor relating to the enforcement of, and compliance with, federal, state, and municipal statutes, ordinances, and regulations.

(g) The lease may establish a specific number of hours to complete a particular shipment of goods and may provide for the creation of shifts which are primarily created to make available transportation equipment on a basis established to meet public need and necessity, and to provide adequate service to the public at all times.

(h) The lease may provide for certain regulations in the event radio telecommunication procedures are used between the certificated carrier or contract carrier and the driver of the vehicle.

(i) The lease may provide that the independent contractor only work for the certificated carrier or contract carrier as a driver during the time the independent contractor is operating the motor vehicle pursuant to the lease.

(j) The lease may prohibit the independent contractor from individually advertising the services being offered while driving for the certificated carrier or contract carrier pursuant to the terms of the lease.

(k) The lease may provide for the carrier to pay the independent contractor's fees when the carrier accepts charge vouchers for services rendered to customers.

(2) The lease may be terminated by any party, but nothing in this section shall be construed as relieving an independent contractor from the obligation of completing an accepted trip.

(3) The lease need not be for a term certain.

(4) Leases containing provisions pursuant to paragraphs (a), (b), (e), (f), (g), (h), and (i) of subsection (1) of this section shall be presumed prima facie evidence of an independent contractor relationship between the parties to the lease. This presumption may be overcome by clear and convincing evidence of an employment relationship between the parties to the lease considering only factors not in the lease. Leases containing the other optional provisions shall not change the characterization of the relationship evidenced by the lease.

(5) (a) Any lease or contract executed pursuant to this section must provide for coverage under workers' compensation or an occupational accident insurance policy that provides similar coverage. (a.5) If an operator of a commercial vehicle obtains similar coverage pursuant to this subsection (5), then the operator:

(I) Is excluded from the definition of employee for purposes of section 8-40-202 (2);

(II) Shall notify the division of workers' compensation in the department of labor and employment of the election, in a manner determined by the director of the division of workers' compensation by rule; and

(III) Shall, along with the motor carrier and contract carrier, provide proof of the similar coverage upon request to interested parties, including the carrier's workers' compensation insurance provider, the division of workers' compensation, and the division of insurance.

(b) As used in this subsection (5), "similar coverage" means:

(I) Insurance benefits designed for independent contractors and sole proprietors who reject workers' compensation coverage and elect, pursuant to this subsection (5), coverage providing medical, temporary and permanent disability, death and dismemberment, and survivor benefits that are subject to regulation by the division of insurance in the department of regulatory agencies. The specifications of the insurance, including coverages, exclusions, policy limits, and the amount, if any, of any deductibles or copayments, must be filed with the division of insurance. The specifications must meet or exceed standards set by the division of insurance and the standards must specify that the benefits offered by the insurance coverage must be at least comparable to the benefits offered under the workers' compensation system.

(II) For services performed by operators of commercial vehicles, an occupational accident insurance policy that provides a minimum aggregate policy limit of one million five hundred thousand dollars for all benefits paid for the benefit of the operator, including medical, temporary and permanent disability, death and dismemberment, and survivor benefits.

(c) The lease shall provide for the payment of such coverage by either the lessor or lessee. If the lease provides for the lessee to pay for such coverage, proof of coverage shall be maintained by the lessor for the duration of the lease and the lessor shall not have liability for failure of compliance by the lessee.

(d) Notwithstanding any other law, if an operator of a commercial vehicle, a motor carrier, or a contract carrier obtains similar coverage pursuant to this subsection (5), articles 40 to 47 of title 8 do not apply.

(e) Repealed.

(6) (a) As used in this section:

(I) "Commercial vehicle" has the same meaning as set forth in section 42-4-235 (1)(a)(I)(B).

(II) "Operator" means the operator of a commercial vehicle:

(A) Who owns, is purchasing, or is leasing the commercial vehicle from any person other than the motor carrier; and

(B) Is the sole proprietor, owner, or partner of an applicable entity; a shareholder of a corporation where there are no more than two shareholders of the corporation; or a member of the applicable entity.

(b) For the purposes of subsection (6)(a)(II) of this section, the ownership, purchase, or leasing of a commercial vehicle by an applicable entity is deemed ownership, purchase, or leasing of the commercial vehicle by the sole proprietor, owner, or partner of an applicable entity; a shareholder of a corporation where there are no more than two shareholders of the corporation; or a member of the applicable entity.

Source: L. 90: Entire article added, p. 1762, § 1, effective June 8. L. 92: (4) amended and (5) added, p. 1800, § 4, effective June 6. L. 2004: (5)(b) amended, p. 906, § 34, effective May 21. L. 2018: (5)(a) and (5)(b) amended and (5)(a.5), (5)(d), and (5)(e) added, (SB 18-178), ch. 203, p. 1317, § 1, effective August 8. L. 2022: IP(5)(a.5), IP(5)(b), (5)(b)(II), and (5)(d) amended, (5)(e) repealed, and (6) added (SB 22-035), ch. 167, p. 1033, § 2, effective August 10.

Cross references: For the legislative declaration in SB 22-035, see section 1 of chapter 167, Session Laws of Colorado 2022.

ARTICLE 12 Commercial Carriers - Motor Vehicles 40-12-101 to 40-12-114. (Repealed) Source: L. 78: Entire article repealed, p. 521, § 8, effective July 1.

Editor's note: This article was numbered as article 10 of chapter 115, C.R.S. 1963. For amendments to this article prior to its repeal in 1978, consult the Colorado statutory research explanatory note and the table itemizing the replacement volumes and supplements to the original volume of C.R.S. 1973 beginning on page vii in the front of this volume.

ARTICLE 13 Towing Carriers - Motor Vehicles 40-13-101 to 40-13-112. (Repealed) Source: L. 2011: Entire article repealed, (HB 11-1198), ch. 127, p. 416, § 2, effective August 10.

Editor's note: This article was numbered as article 14 of chapter 115, C.R.S. 1963. For amendments to this article prior to its repeal in 2011, consult the 2010 Colorado Revised Statutes and the Colorado statutory research explanatory note beginning on page vii in the front of this volume.

Cross references: For current provisions concerning towing carriers, see article 10.1 of this title.

ARTICLE 14 Carriers of Household Goods 40-14-101 to 40-14-114. (Repealed) Source: L. 2011: Entire article repealed, (HB 11-1198), ch. 127, p. 416, § 2, effective August 10.

Editor's note: This article was added in 1984, repealed in 1995, and recreated and reenacted in 2003. For amendments to this article prior to its repeal in 2011, consult the 2010 Colorado Revised Statutes and the Colorado statutory research explanatory note beginning on page vii in the front of this volume.

Cross references: For current provisions concerning carriers of household goods, see article 10.1 of this title.

ARTICLE 15 Intrastate Telecommunications Services Editor's note: This article was added in 1984. This article was repealed and reenacted in 1987, resulting in the addition, relocation, and elimination of sections as well as subject matter. For amendments to this article prior to 1987, consult the Colorado statutory research explanatory note and the table itemizing the replacement volumes and supplements to the original volume of C.R.S. 1973 beginning on page vii in the front of this volume. Former C.R.S. section numbers are shown in editor's notes following those sections that were relocated.

PART 1

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1993–2011 · leading case: SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 40× “Statutory Provisions of Section 40-11.5-102 As to the other statutory provisions cited by SZL, section 40-11.”
USF Distrib. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off. of Colorado, 111 P.3d 529 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 34× “2004, excludes from the term “employee” any person who is working as a driver under a lease agreement with a common carrier or contract carrier pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. 2004. Section 8-40-301(6), C.”
Frank C. Klein & Co. v. Colorado Comp. Ins. Auth., 859 P.2d 323 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 29× “Klein further argued that the lease agreements constituted prima facie evidence of the owner/operators’ status as “independent contractors” pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. (1992 Cum.Supp.), effective June 8, 1990.”
Scott v. Matlack, Inc., 1 P.3d 185 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 5× “It is undisputed that the lease agreement complies with § 40-11.5-102, CRS. 1998 (setting forth the requirements for leases between motor carriers and independent contractors).”
FFE Transp. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 93 P.3d 630 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 11× “Grego and FFE met the requirements of an independent contractor agreement under § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S.2003. However, because claimant was not a party to that lease agreement, the ALJ determined that claimant was not “working .”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(1) — 3 cases
SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “Statutory Provisions of Section 40-11.5-102 As to the other statutory provisions cited by SZL, section 40-11.”
USF Distrib. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off. of Colorado, 111 P.3d 529 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “2004, excludes from the term “employee” any person who is working as a driver under a lease agreement with a common carrier or contract carrier pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. 2004. Section 8-40-301(6), C.”
FFE Transp. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 93 P.3d 630 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “Grego and FFE met the requirements of an independent contractor agreement under § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S.2003. However, because claimant was not a party to that lease agreement, the ALJ determined that claimant was not “working .”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(1)(2) — 1 case
SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “Statutory Provisions of Section 40-11.5-102 As to the other statutory provisions cited by SZL, section 40-11.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(1)(a) — 1 case
SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “Statutory Provisions of Section 40-11.5-102 As to the other statutory provisions cited by SZL, section 40-11.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(1)(a)(I) — 1 case
SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “Statutory Provisions of Section 40-11.5-102 As to the other statutory provisions cited by SZL, section 40-11.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(1)(a)(II) — 1 case
SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “Statutory Provisions of Section 40-11.5-102 As to the other statutory provisions cited by SZL, section 40-11.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(1)(i) — 1 case
SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “Statutory Provisions of Section 40-11.5-102 As to the other statutory provisions cited by SZL, section 40-11.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(4) — 3 cases
SZL, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 254 P.3d 1180 (Colo. Ct. App. 2011). “Statutory Provisions of Section 40-11.5-102 As to the other statutory provisions cited by SZL, section 40-11.”
Frank C. Klein & Co. v. Colorado Comp. Ins. Auth., 859 P.2d 323 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). “Klein further argued that the lease agreements constituted prima facie evidence of the owner/operators’ status as “independent contractors” pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. (1992 Cum.Supp.), effective June 8, 1990.”
USF Distrib. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off. of Colorado, 111 P.3d 529 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “2004, excludes from the term “employee” any person who is working as a driver under a lease agreement with a common carrier or contract carrier pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. 2004. Section 8-40-301(6), C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(5) — 3 cases
USF Distrib. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off. of Colorado, 111 P.3d 529 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “2004, excludes from the term “employee” any person who is working as a driver under a lease agreement with a common carrier or contract carrier pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. 2004. Section 8-40-301(6), C.”
Scott v. Matlack, Inc., 1 P.3d 185 (Colo. Ct. App. 2000). “It is undisputed that the lease agreement complies with § 40-11.5-102, CRS. 1998 (setting forth the requirements for leases between motor carriers and independent contractors).”
FFE Transp. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 93 P.3d 630 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “Grego and FFE met the requirements of an independent contractor agreement under § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S.2003. However, because claimant was not a party to that lease agreement, the ALJ determined that claimant was not “working .”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(5)(a) — 1 case
USF Distrib. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off. of Colorado, 111 P.3d 529 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “2004, excludes from the term “employee” any person who is working as a driver under a lease agreement with a common carrier or contract carrier pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. 2004. Section 8-40-301(6), C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(5)(b) — 1 case
USF Distrib. Servs., Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off. of Colorado, 111 P.3d 529 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). “2004, excludes from the term “employee” any person who is working as a driver under a lease agreement with a common carrier or contract carrier pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. 2004. Section 8-40-301(6), C.”
— Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-11.5-102(l)(b) — 1 case
Frank C. Klein & Co. v. Colorado Comp. Ins. Auth., 859 P.2d 323 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). “Klein further argued that the lease agreements constituted prima facie evidence of the owner/operators’ status as “independent contractors” pursuant to § 40-11.5-102, C.R.S. (1992 Cum.Supp.), effective June 8, 1990.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.