Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 40-8-102 (2026)
Undistributed balance to county commissioners - when
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Subject to the provisions of section 40-8-101, in all cases where rights to refunds from a similar overcharge have accrued to the inhabitants of any county, outside of a municipality therein, the undistributed balance shall be turned over to the county commissioners of such county.
Source: L. 47: p. 704, § 2. CSA: C. 137, § 70. CRS 53: § 115-8-2. C.R.S. 1963: § 115- 8-2. L. 90: Entire section amended, p. 1761, § 3, effective May 31.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1983–2007 · leading case: Colorado Off. of Consum. Couns. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 42 P.3d 23 (Colo. 2002).
Colorado Off. of Consum. Couns. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 42 P.3d 23 (Colo. 2002). “Therefore, the PUC argues, the district court correctly held that the PUC properly pursued its authority when it ruled that the rates for the NOW Plan do not violate the rate cap.”
City of Fort Morgan v. Colorado Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 159 P.3d 87 (Colo. 2007). “Section 40-8-102 vests in the PUC the power to "generally supervise and regulate every public utility in this state," except that "nothing in this article shall apply to municipal gas or electric utilities for which an exemption is provided in the constitution of the state of…”
Citizens Action Coalition of Indiana, Inc. v. Pub. Serv. Co. of Indiana, 450 N.E.2d 98 (Ind. Ct. App. 1983). “To find otherwise would empower the PUC, an appointed, nonelected body, to create a special rate for any group it determined to be deserving.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.