Colorado Revised Statutes
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-2-101 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This article shall be known and may be cited as the "Unfair Practices Act".
Source: L. 37: p. 1287, § 14. CSA: C. 48, § 302(13). L. 41: p. 824, § 13. L. 49: p. 349, § 17. CRS 53: § 55-2-17. C.R.S. 1963: § 55-2-17.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1975–2021 · leading case: Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc., 829 P.2d 1286 (Colo. 1992).
Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc., 829 P.2d 1286 (Colo. 1992). “Cablevision's system of pricing violates the Colorado Unfair Practices Act, CRS 6-2-101 et seq. because it constitutes a sale of cable television service below cost and/or it discriminates between different portions of the City of Colorado Springs by furnishing service at a…”
Amoco Oil Co. v. Ervin, 908 P.2d 493 (Colo. 1996). “[3] The dealers cross-appealed a summary judgment entered in favor of Amoco on a claim that it violated Colorado's Unfair Practices Act, § 6-2-101, 2 C.R.S. (1992), and an order denying damages for certicare signs on Amoco's capital asset ledger calculations.”
Greenway Nutrients, Inc. v. Blackburn, 33 F. Supp. 3d 1224 (D. Colo. 2014). “Counts VI, VII, VIII, IX, and X — Trade mark Infringement ( 15 U.S.C. § 1114 ), False Designation of Origin/Unfair Competition ( 15 U.”
TV Commc'ns Network, Inc. v. ESPN, Inc., 767 F. Supp. 1062 (D. Colo. 1991). “STATE LAW VIOLATIONS BY ALL DEFENDANTS Plaintiffs thirteenth and fourteenth causes of action allege violations of Colo.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 6-2-101 through 6-2-117 (Bradford 1974 and Supp.”
Ervin v. Amoco Oil Co., 885 P.2d 246 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994). “Although four of the dealers’ six claims were dismissed prior to trial, the dealers cross-appeal only a summary judgment entered in favor of Amoco on a claim that it violated § 6-2-101, C.R.S. (1992 Repl.Vol. 2), Colorado’s Unfair Practices Act, and an order denying damages for…”
Frontier Airlines, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., 758 F. Supp. 1399 (D. Colo. 1989). “, (3) violations of the Colorado Unfair Practices Act, Colo.Rev.Stat. § 6-2-101, et seq., and (4) common law tortious interference with contracts and prospective contractual relations.”
In Re New Motor Vehs. Canadian Exp. Antitrust Litig., 350 F. Supp. 2d 160 (D. Me. 2004). “I also note that Colorado has a separate statute regulating unfair practices, Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 6-2-101 to -117, labeled the "Unfair Practices Act” It is devoted to discriminatory and below-cost pricing and is not at issue here.”
Mem'l Gardens, Inc. v. Olympian Sales & Mgmt. Consultants, Inc., 690 P.2d 207 (Colo. 1984). “§§ 6-2-101 to -117, 2 C.R.S. (1973 & 1983 Supp.”
Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc., 855 P.2d 6 (Colo. Ct. App. 1992). “The plaintiffs brought this suit seeking damages under Colorado’s Unfair Trade Practices Act (Act), § 6-2-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1992 Repl.Vol.”
Direct Sales Tire Co. v. Dist. Court in & for the Cnty. of Jefferson, 686 P.2d 1316 (Colo. 1984). “The underlying action pending in the respondent court involves alleged sales of unbranded gasoline by Direct Sales at a retail price below cost in violation of the Colorado Unfair Practices Act, sections 6-2-101 to -117, 2 C.R.S. (1973 & 1983 Supp.”
Dunlap v. Colorado Springs Cablevision, Inc., 799 P.2d 416 (Colo. Ct. App. 1990). “The plaintiffs initially assert that the trial court erred in dismissing their claim arising under the Colorado Unfair Practices Act (Act), § 6-2-101, et seq., C.R.S. We disagree. Section 6-2-103(1), C.”
Q-T Markets, Inc. v. Fleming Companies, Inc., 394 F. Supp. 1102 (D. Colo. 1975). “§§ 6-2-101 through 6-2-117 (1973). 3 Secret rebates or refunds are prohibited by § 108 of that statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.