Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 7-106-104 (2026)

Fractional shares

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) A corporation may:

(a) Issue fractions of a share or pay in cash the value of fractions of a share;

(b) Arrange for disposition of fractional shares by the shareholders; or

(c) Issue scrip in registered form entitling the holder to receive a full share upon surrendering enough scrip to equal a full share.

(2) Each certificate representing scrip shall be conspicuously labeled "scrip" and shall contain the information required to be included in a share certificate by sections 7-106-206 (2)(a), (2)(c), and (4) and 7-106-208 (2).

(3) The holder of a fractional share is entitled to exercise the rights of a shareholder, including the right to vote, to receive dividends, and to participate in the assets of the corporation upon liquidation. The holder of scrip is not entitled to any of these rights unless the scrip provides for them.

(4) The board of directors may authorize the issuance of scrip subject to any condition considered desirable, including:

(a) That the scrip will become void if not exchanged for full shares before a stated date; and

(b) That the shares for which the scrip is exchangeable may be sold and the proceeds paid to the scripholders.

Source: L. 93: Entire article added, p. 755, § 1, effective July 1, 1994. L. 2003: (4)(a) amended, p. 2316, § 228, effective July 1, 2004. L. 2023: (1)(c) amended, (HB 23-1297), ch. 441, p. 2582, § 1, effective August 7.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2000–2000 · leading case: Lerner v. Lerner Corp., 750 A.2d 709 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2000).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lerner v. Lerner Corp., 750 A.2d 709 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2000). “Code § 407 (West 1999); Colo.Rev. Stat. § 7-106-104 (1999); Conn.”

Lerner v. Lerner Corp., 750 A.2d 709 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 2000). “Code § 407 (West 1999); Colo.Rev.Stat. § 7-106-104 (1999); Conn. Gen.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.