Colorado Revised Statutes

Colo. Rev. Stat. § 8-70-101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CO-LEGleg.colorado.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Articles 70 to 82 of this title shall be known and may be cited as the "Colorado Employment Security Act".

Source: L. 36, 3rd Ex. Sess.: p. 13, § 1. CSA: C. 167A, § 1. L. 41: p. 761, § 1. CRS 53: § 82-1-1. C.R.S. 1963: § 82-1-1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 42 cases, 1979–2019 · leading case: Colorado Div. of Emp. v. Accord Human Resources, Inc., 270 P.3d 985 (Colo. 2012).
Colorado Div. of Emp. v. Accord Human Resources, Inc., 270 P.3d 985 (Colo. 2012). · cites it 2× “¶ 10 The Colorado Employment Security Act, sections 8-70-101 to -82-105, C.R.S. (2011) ("CESA"), establishes an unemployment insurance fund ("Fund") financed by employer-paid premiums or taxes.”
Mesa Cnty. Pub. Library Dist. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 2017 CO 78 (Colo. 2017). · cites it 3× “4 5 The supreme court holds that where the Division of Unemployment Insurance 6 determines a claimant was mentally unable to perform assigned work under section 7 8-73-108(4)(j) of the Colorado Employment Security Act, §§ 8-70-101 to 8-82-105, C.R.S. 8 (2016), neither the text…”
Indus. Claim Appeals Off. v. Softrock Geological Servs., Inc., 325 P.3d 560 (Colo. 2014). “Under the Colorado Employment Security Act ("CESA"), §§ 8-70-101 to 8-82-105, C.R.S. (20183), employers must pay unemployment taxes on wages paid to employees but not on compensation paid to independent contractors.”
Salida Sch. Dist. R-32-J v. Morrison, 732 P.2d 1160 (Colo. 1987). · cites it 3× “In the summer of 1980, Morrison filed a claim for unemployment compensation under the Colorado Employment Security Act, sections 8-70-101 to 8-82-105 (1986). A deputy of the Division of Employment and Training (Division) found that Morrison’s contract was not renewed due to lack…”
Allen Co., Inc. v. Indus. Com'n, 762 P.2d 677 (Colo. 1988). “The Colorado Employment Security Act, sections 8-70-101 to 8-82-105, 3B C.R.S. (1986 & 1987 Supp.”
Home Health Care Professionals v. Colorado Dep't of Labor & Emp., Div. of Emp., 937 P.2d 851 (Colo. Ct. App. 1996). “The Division of Labor & Employment (Division) contended that the physical therapists, home health aides, and registered nurses were engaged in covered employment for purposes of the Colorado Employment Security Act (Act), § 8-70-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol.”
Bell v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off., 93 P.3d 584 (Colo. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “The Colorado Employment Security Act, § 8-70-101, et seq., C.R.S.2003, delegates to the hearing officer and the Panel the responsibility for applying the standards adopted by the General Assembly to determine whether, under all the circumstances of the case, a particular…”
In Re Adamic, 291 B.R. 175 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2003). · cites it 2× “See Colo.Rev.Stat. §§ 8-70-101 to 8-82-105; 7 Colo.”
Carpet Exch. of Denver, Inc. v. Indus. Claim Appeals Off. of the State, 859 P.2d 278 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “, seeks review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel, which ruled that workers who installed floor covering purchased *281 by the company's customers were in employment covered by the Colorado Employment Security Act, § 8-70-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol.”
Colorado v. Wine (In re Wine), 558 B.R. 438 (Bankr.D. Colo. 2016). “§ 8-70-101 et seq. . Unless otherwise indicated, all references to "Section” are to Sections of the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.”
Indus. Comm'n v. Arteaga, 735 P.2d 473 (Colo. 1987). · cites it 2× “The court determined that Arteaga was "permanently residing in the United States under color of law" because the INS was aware of his technically illegal presence and yet consented to it by suspending efforts to deport him and by authorizing him to work. The court of appeals…”
Indus. Comm'n v. Moffat Cnty. Sch. Dist. RE No. 1, 732 P.2d 616 (Colo. 1987). “Under pertinent provisions of the Colorado Employment Security Act, sections 8-70-101 to 8-82-105, 3B C.R.S. (1986), persons otherwise entitled to full unemployment benefits may be disqualified from receiving benefits if their separation from employment occurred for one of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.