Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 01 — PROVISIONS OF GENERAL APPLICATION · Chapter 14 — Freedom of Information Act
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-201 (2026)

(Formerly Sec. 1-19c). Division of Criminal Justice deemed not to be public agency, when

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
For the purposes of subdivision (1) of section 1-200, the Division of Criminal Justice shall not be deemed to be a public agency except in respect to its administrative functions.

(P.A. 84-406, S. 12, 13; P.A. 00-66, S. 4.)

History: P.A. 84-406 effective November 28, 1984, upon certification by secretary of the state of vote on constitutional amendment re appointment of state's attorneys; Sec. 1-19c transferred to Sec. 1-201 in 1999; P.A. 00-66 changed the reference to Sec. 1-200(1).

Annotations to former section 1-19c:

Cited. 206 C. 449; 217 C. 153; Id., 193; 218 C. 256; Id., 757; 220 C. 225; 221 C. 217; Id., 300; Id., 393; Id., 482; Id., 549; 222 C. 621; 227 C. 641; 228 C. 158; Id., 271.

Cited. 22 CA 316; 29 CA 821; 35 CA 111; 37 CA 589; 42 CA 402; 43 CA 133.

Cited. 42 CS 84; Id., 129; Id., 291.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1973–2025 · leading case: State v. DeJesus, 953 A.2d 45 (Conn. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. DeJesus, 953 A.2d 45 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 2× “§ 1-201 (a) (LexisNexis 2006) (construing constitutional authority to adopt *522 rules of practice and procedure to include “regulation of the form and method of taking and the admissibility of evidence in all cases”); N.”
K. L. C., Inc. v. Brookside Drug Store, Inc. (In Re Brookside Drug Store, Inc.), 3 B.R. 120 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1980). · cites it 3× “) Determination of whether or not a lease is intended as security must be in accordance with the terms of the definition of a security interest found in UCC § 1-201(37) (Conn.Gen.Stats. 42a-1-201(37)), which reads in pertinent part: Whether a lease is intended as security is to…”
Franklin Credit Mgmt. Corp. v. Nicholas, 812 A.2d 51 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). “) American Law Institute, Uniform Commercial Code (2002) § 1-201, official comment (39). Common sense and commercial experience were the keys in the court’s analysis of the authentication of the form 1099-C at issue here.”
In Re Henrry P. B.-P., 173 A.3d 928 (Conn. 2017). “Law § 1-201 , which expanded definition of "child" to "unmarried individual under the age of twenty-one" with respect to juvenile status petitions); H.”
W. Dermatology Consultants, P.C. v. VitalWorks, Inc., 78 A.3d 167 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013). “Official comment 3 to § 1-201 of the UCC provides in relevant part that “[w]hether an agreement has legal consequences is determined by applicable provisions of the [UCC] and, to the extent possible provided in [§] 1-103, by the law of contracts.”
Perley v. Glastonbury Bank & Trust Co., 368 A.2d 149 (Conn. 1976). “The section protects parties who act not only in good faith, (Section 1-201) but also in observance of the reasonable standards of their business.”
Granite Equip. Leasing Corp. v. Acme Pump Co., 335 A.2d 294 (Conn. 1973). · cites it 2× “” Acme seeks to have this court rule, as a matter of law, that its lease agreement created a security interest because it contained an option provision for Acme to purchase the machine for a “nominal consideration” as that term is used in § 42a-l-201 (37) (§ 1-201 [37] of the…”
Wells Fargo Bank v. Hartford Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 484 F. Supp. 817 (D. Conn. 1980). · cites it 2× “§ 1-201(3), which includes those agreements implied from commercial practice.”
Chief of Police v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 792 A.2d 141 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 2× “…that the plaintiffs were not exempt from producing the registry under General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 1-19c, now § 1-201, 7 or under § 1-19 (b) (3). Judge Hartmere concluded that § 1-19c did not apply because the registry was clearly compiled and maintained as an…”
Ace Equip. Sales, Inc. v. H.O. Penn Mach. Co., 871 A.2d 402 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005). “2d 567 (1974) (evidence that automobile leasing firm had on occasion sold automobiles sufficient to support finding that leasing firm was in business of selling goods of the kind within meaning of subsection [9] of § 1-201 of the Uniform Commercial Code [UCC]); Sea Harvest, Inc.”
Zeigler v. Sony Corp. of Am., 849 A.2d 19 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2004). “That argument ignores that UCC § 1-201 (26) provides the steps required of a buyer to provide notice “whether or not such other actually comes to know of it.”
Old Repub. Nat'l Title Ins. v. Bank of East Asia Ltd., 291 F. Supp. 2d 60 (D. Conn. 2003). “A "holder” is defined as a "person who is in possession of a document of title or an instrument or an investment certificated security drawn, issued or indorsed to him or to his order or to bearer or in blank.”
Show all 16 citing cases →
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-201(20) — 1 case
Old Repub. Nat'l Title Ins. v. Bank of East Asia Ltd., 291 F. Supp. 2d 60 (D. Conn. 2003). “A "holder” is defined as a "person who is in possession of a document of title or an instrument or an investment certificated security drawn, issued or indorsed to him or to his order or to bearer or in blank.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-201(3) — 1 case
Wells Fargo Bank v. Hartford Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 484 F. Supp. 817 (D. Conn. 1980). “§ 1-201(3), which includes those agreements implied from commercial practice.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-201(37) — 2 cases
K. L. C., Inc. v. Brookside Drug Store, Inc. (In Re Brookside Drug Store, Inc.), 3 B.R. 120 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1980). “) Determination of whether or not a lease is intended as security must be in accordance with the terms of the definition of a security interest found in UCC § 1-201(37) (Conn.Gen.Stats. 42a-1-201(37)), which reads in pertinent part: Whether a lease is intended as security is to…”
Huntington Tech. Fin., Inc. v. Neff (D. Conn. 2020).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-201(38) — 1 case
Wells Fargo Bank v. Hartford Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 484 F. Supp. 817 (D. Conn. 1980). “§ 1-201(3), which includes those agreements implied from commercial practice.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-201(a) — 1 case
State v. DeJesus, 953 A.2d 45 (Conn. 2008). “§ 1-201 (a) (LexisNexis 2006) (construing constitutional authority to adopt *522 rules of practice and procedure to include “regulation of the form and method of taking and the admissibility of evidence in all cases”); N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.