Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 01 — PROVISIONS OF GENERAL APPLICATION · Chapter 3 — Public Records: General Provisions
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-21i (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 14, Sec. 1-206.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases, 1979–2015 · leading case: Off. of Consum. Couns. v. Dep't of Pub. Util. Control, 662 A.2d 1251 (Conn. 1995).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Off. of Consum. Couns. v. Dep't of Pub. Util. Control, 662 A.2d 1251 (Conn. 1995). · cites it 14× “217 , this court was required to interpret the meaning of the term “party” within the framework of General Statutes § 1-21i (d). That provision provides in relevant part: “Any party aggrieved by the decision of [the Freedom of Information Commission] may appeal therefrom, in…”
Town of West Hartford v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 588 A.2d 1368 (Conn. 1991). · cites it 7× “Failure to comply with a request to so inspect or copy such public record within such four business day period shall be deemed to be a denial.” The result we reach is not inconsistent with our earlier conclusion that the time periods within which the FOIC must hear and decide an…”
State v. Salmon, 735 A.2d 333 (Conn. 1999). · cites it 3× “225 -26, this court was required to inteipret the meaning of the term “party” in the context of General Statutes § 1-21i (d), which provides in relevant part: “Any party aggrieved by the decision of [the freedom of information commission] may appeal therefrom, in accordance with…”
Gold v. Rowland, 994 A.2d 106 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 2× “This court held in Rose that the word "party" as used in General Statutes § 1-21i(d), now General Statutes § 1-206(d), includes intervenors in proceedings before the freedom of information commission for purposes of allowing an appeal by an aggrieved party.”
Royce v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 418 A.2d 939 (Conn. 1979). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 1-21i (d) provides in part that “[a]ny party aggrieved by the decision of said [freedom of information] commission may *586 appeal therefrom, in accordance with the provisions of section 4-183.”
Dom. Violence Servs. of Greater New Haven, Inc. v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 688 A.2d 314 (Conn. 1997). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff appealed from the decision of the FOIC to the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes §§ 1-21i (d) 6 and 4-183 7 on the ground that the FOIC had improperly found that the plaintiff was a public agency.”
Ethics Comm'n v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 23 A.3d 1211 (Conn. 2011). · cites it 4× “to 1977) §§ 1-21i (d) and l-21k (b). Broadly characterized, these provisions deal with incidental matters necessary to effectuate the essential rights of access to public records and meetings, such as prompt compliance with requests, notice and conduct *14 requirements for…”
Connecticut Bus. & Indus. Ass'n v. Comm'n on Hospitals & Health Care, 589 A.2d 356 (Conn. 1991). “to 1985] §§ 1-21i [d], 4-183); State Medical Society v.”
City of Hartford v. Chase, 733 F. Supp. 533 (D. Conn. 1990). · cites it 2× “Conn. Gen.Stat. § 1-21i(d). It would seem anomalous for this court to find a compelling need under Connecticut law only to have a contrary result reached in the Connecticut FOIA process.”
Wenc v. City of New London, 667 A.2d 61 (Conn. 1995). “responsibilities on such board, commission, committee or agency if such person was acting in good faith, and within the scope of such person’s official functions and duties, and was not acting in violation of any state, municipal or professional code of ethics regulating the…”
Furhman v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 703 A.2d 624 (Conn. 1997). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 1-21i (d) provides that appeals from the decisions of the commission are taken pursuant to the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (UAPA).”
Raymond v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 787 A.2d 56 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). “to 1995) § 1-21i (b) (1), now § 1-206 (b) (1), provides in relevant part: “Any person .”
Show all 14 citing cases →
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-21i(b) — 1 case
Ethics Comm'n v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 23 A.3d 1211 (Conn. 2011). “to 1977) §§ 1-21i (d) and l-21k (b). Broadly characterized, these provisions deal with incidental matters necessary to effectuate the essential rights of access to public records and meetings, such as prompt compliance with requests, notice and conduct *14 requirements for…”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 1-21i(d) — 2 cases
Gold v. Rowland, 994 A.2d 106 (Conn. 2010). “This court held in Rose that the word "party" as used in General Statutes § 1-21i(d), now General Statutes § 1-206(d), includes intervenors in proceedings before the freedom of information commission for purposes of allowing an appeal by an aggrieved party.”
City of Hartford v. Chase, 733 F. Supp. 533 (D. Conn. 1990). “Conn. Gen.Stat. § 1-21i(d). It would seem anomalous for this court to find a compelling need under Connecticut law only to have a contrary result reached in the Connecticut FOIA process.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.