Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-13 (2026)

Appointment of physicians for technical education and career schools

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 10-13 is repealed, effective July 1, 2022.

(1949 Rev., S. 1347; 1959, P.A. 411, S. 1; February, 1965, P.A. 330, S. 19; P.A. 12-116, S. 87; P.A. 17-237, S. 41; P.A. 22-118, S. 514.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 18 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1975–2025 · leading case: Connor v. Statewide Grievance Comm., 797 A.2d 1081 (Conn. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Connor v. Statewide Grievance Comm., 797 A.2d 1081 (Conn. 2002). “Pleadings asserting such new or additional claims for relief were to be served in the same manner that an original writ or complaint is served.”

Bittle v. Comm'r of Soc. Servs., 734 A.2d 551 (Conn. 1999). · cites it 2× “See Practice Book § 10-13. 11 Harmonizing the procedure for service of appeal papers in appeals from administrative decisions with our civil procedures, as we do in this case, will further advance the legislature’s *517 intent “to provide the consumer who is using our…”

Lee v. Bd. of Educ., 434 A.2d 333 (Conn. 1980). “2d 18 (1976); see Tribe, American Constitutional Law § 10-13. The loss with which the plaintiff is threatened is substantial.”

Pitchell v. City of Hartford, 722 A.2d 797 (Conn. 1999). “Practice Book § 10-13, formerly § 122, provides in relevant part that service of process may be made by mailing a copy of the pleadings to the “last known address of the attorney or party.”

Jimenez v. DeRosa, 951 A.2d 632 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “2d 150 (2003); see also Practice Book § 10-13. For service pursuant to § 52-57 (a), the “usual place of abode” presumptively is the defendant’s home at the time when service is made.”

Schaffer v. Schaffer, 445 A.2d 589 (Conn. 1982). ““The fact-finding function is vested in the trial court with its unique opportunity to view the evidence presented in a totality of circumstances, i.”

Wilson v. Troxler, 883 A.2d 18 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005). “See Practice Book § 10-13. The court therefore improperly relied on General Statutes § 52-64.”

Brennan v. Town of Fairfield, 753 A.2d 396 (Conn. App. Ct. 2000). “The plaintiff also seeks to persuade us that because service by mail is acceptable in other jurisdictions and by the rules of practice in this jurisdiction; Practice Book § 10-13 (service by mail complete upon mailing); as well as in the federal courts; Fed.”

Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Fritzell, 198 A.3d 642 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018). “" Practice Book § 10-13 further provides in relevant part that "[s]ervice upon the attorney or upon a self-represented party .”

Monahan v. Holmes, 139 F. Supp. 2d 253 (D. Conn. 2001). “Section 10-13 of Connecticut’s Practice Rules for the Superior Court provides that “[s]erviee upon the attorney or upon a pro se party .”

Herbst v. Int'l Tel. & Tel. Corp., 65 F.R.D. 528 (D. Conn. 1975). “McCormick, Handbook of the Law of Evidence §§ 10-13 (1954). It may be that they cannot be qualified, of course, but it is clear that they are to be expert witnesses if they are to be witnesses at all.”

Finan v. Finan, 945 A.2d 476 (Conn. App. Ct. 2008). · cites it 2× “Instead, the defendant merely argues that the plaintiffs request for production lacked the requisite certification under Practice Book § 10-13. 5 The defendant concedes that the plaintiff mailed that request to him on October 25, 2006.”

Show all 18 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.