Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 10-151a (2026)

Access of teacher to supervisory records and reports in personnel file

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each professional employee certified by the State Board of Education and employed by any local or regional board of education shall be entitled to knowledge of, access to, and, upon request, a copy of supervisory records and reports of competence, personal character and efficiency maintained in such employee's personnel file with reference to evaluation of performance as a professional employee of such board of education.

(1967, P.A. 464; P.A. 73-345; P.A. 78-218, S. 100.)

History: P.A. 73-345 required provision of copies of records and reports in personnel file upon request; P.A. 78-218 substituted “local” for “town” board of education and made technical changes.

Cited. 174 C. 366.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1978–2014 · leading case: Lee v. Bd. of Educ., 434 A.2d 333 (Conn. 1980).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Lee v. Bd. of Educ., 434 A.2d 333 (Conn. 1980). · cites it 2× ““Where the board itself does not hold the hearing on termination and a panel of three persons does, as provided by General Statutes § 10-151 (b), that panel must “submit in writing its findings and a recommendation to the board of education as to the disposition of the charges…”

Wanamaker v. Town of Westport Bd. of Educ., 11 F. Supp. 3d 51 (D. Conn. 2014). “§ 10-151a (Def.’s Ex. HH). A five-day hearing (“the § 10-151 hearing”) was then held before a panel consisting of Peter Adomeit, Esq.”

Adamchek v. Bd. of Educ., 387 A.2d 556 (Conn. 1978). “The trial court concluded that the board failed to comply with certain provisions of the Uniform Administrative Procedure Act (hereinafter the UAPA); 1 that it failed to provide the plaintiffs with adequate statements of the reasons for its nonrenewal of the contracts, as…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.