Any parent or guardian or emancipated minor or a pupil eighteen years of age or older or local or regional board of education aggrieved by the finding of the hearing board established by the State Board of Education rendered under the provisions of section
10-186 may appeal therefrom in accordance with the provisions of section
4-183, except venue for such appeal shall be in the judicial district within which such board is situated.
(1949 Rev., S. 1448; 1971, P.A. 870, S. 19; P.A. 74-183, S. 188, 291; P.A. 76-436, S. 164, 681; P.A. 77-603, S. 9, 125; P.A. 78-218, S. 119; 78-280, S. 1, 127; P.A. 79-292, S. 2, 3; P.A. 80-175, S. 3, 5.)
History: 1971 act substituted court of common pleas for superior court; P.A. 74-183 included reference to judicial districts; P.A. 76-436 substituted superior court for court of common pleas, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 77-603 made appeals subject to provisions of Sec. 4-183 except that venue is in county or judicial district within which town is located; P.A. 78-218 replaced “town” with “local or regional board of education”; P.A. 78-280 deleted reference to counties; P.A. 79-292 changed section to refer to findings of hearing board rather than state board of education; P.A. 80-175 allowed appeal to be taken by emancipated minor or pupil 18 or older.
Cited. 148 C. 238.
Cited. 19 CA 428; 34 CA 567.
Notes of Decisions
Town of Waterford v. Connecticut State Bd. of Educ., 169 A.2d 891 (Conn. 1961).
· cites it 8× “We follow the trial court in treating the first count as an appeal from an order of the defendant, the state board of education, requiring the plaintiff to provide transportation for certain pupils attending the Jordan School in Waterford; General Statutes § 10-187; and in…”
Baerst v. State Bd. of Educ., 642 A.2d 76 (Conn. App. Ct. 1994).
· cites it 2× “The plaintiff thereafter appealed that decision of the hearing board pursuant to General Statutes §§ 10-187 and 4-183, naming the New Canaan, Norwalk, and state boards of education as defendants.”
Blau v. State Bd. of Educ., 562 A.2d 586 (Conn. App. Ct. 1989).
· cites it 2× “The plaintiff then filed her appeal to the Superior Court pursuant to General Statutes §§ 10-187 and 4-183. On December 6, 1988, the trial court sustained the plaintiffs appeal on the basis of the late filing of the hearing board’s decision, in violation of § 10-186 (b) (3), and…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.