Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 12 — TAXATION · Chapter 203 — Property Tax Assessment
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-103 (2026)

Appeals

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The owner of such land may appeal to the superior court for the judicial district in which such property is situated, from the valuation of the assessors, both in respect to such land and the timber thereon, within the time and in the manner provided for appeals from the doings of boards of assessment appeals. If the town within which land classified by the State Forester as forest land is situated claims that such land is not intended by the owner thereof in good faith to be used for forestry purposes, such town may appeal from the decision of the State Forester so classifying such land to said court. The owner of such land may also appeal to said court from the decision of the State Forester refusing such classification. Such appeals shall be taken within thirty days after the filing of the certificate of classification in the office of the assessor of such town or the refusal of such classification, as the case may be, and shall be brought by petition in writing with proper citation, signed by competent authority, to the adverse parties, at least twelve days before the return day. Said court shall have the same powers in respect to such appeals as are provided by section 12-117a.

(1949 Rev., S. 1787; 1963, P.A. 423, S. 3; P.A. 76-436, S. 303, 681; P.A. 78-280, S. 1, 127; P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; P.A. 95-220, S. 4–6; 95-283, S. 44, 68; P.A. 99-215, S. 24, 29; P.A. 00-18, S. 2, 3.)

History: 1963 act changed reference to filing of certificate in town clerk's office to filing in assessor's office; P.A. 76-436 substituted superior court for court of common pleas and included reference to judicial districts, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 78-280 deleted reference to counties; P.A. 95-283 replaced board of tax review with board of assessment appeals and provided that appeals be taken to the judicial district of Hartford-New Britain instead of the district in which the land is located, effective July 6, 1995 (Revisor's note: P.A. 88-230, 90-98, 93-142 and 95-220 authorized substitution of “judicial district of Hartford” for “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” in 1995 public and special acts, effective September 1, 1998); P.A. 99-215 replaced “judicial district of Hartford” with “judicial district of New Britain”, effective June 29, 1999; P.A. 00-18 provided that owner may appeal to superior court in judicial district where property is situated, effective July 1, 2000.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Secs. 12-104 to 12-107. Tree-growth land: Certificate by State Forester; taxation; revocation of certificate; when owner may cut wood. Sections 12-104 to 12-107, inclusive, are repealed.

(1949 Rev., S. 1788–1791; 1963, P.A. 490, S. 13.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2015–2015 · leading case: Cales v. Off. of Victim Servs. (Conn. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cales v. Off. of Victim Servs. (Conn. 2015). · cites it 2× “Practice Book § 14-7 (c) provides: ‘‘Appeals in which the parties are entitled to a trial de novo, including but not limited to: (1) appeals from municipal boards of tax review or boards of assessment appeals taken pursuant to General Statutes §§ 12-117a and 12- 119; (2) appeals…”
Cales v. Off. of Victim Servs. (Conn. 2015). · cites it 2× “Practice Book § 14-7 (c) provides: ‘‘Appeals in which the parties are entitled to a trial de novo, including but not limited to: (1) appeals from municipal boards of tax review or boards of assessment appeals taken pursuant to General Statutes §§ 12-117a and 12- 119; (2) appeals…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.