Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-111b (2026)

Commissioner of Children and Families' duties re reunification of child with parent. Court determination on motion that reunification efforts are not required. Permanency plans

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The Commissioner of Children and Families shall make reasonable efforts to reunify a parent with a child unless the court (1) determines that such efforts are not required pursuant to subsection (b) of this section or subsection (j) of section 17a-112, or (2) has approved a permanency plan other than reunification pursuant to subsection (k) of section 46b-129.

(b) The Commissioner of Children and Families or any other party may, at any time, file a motion with the court for a determination that reasonable efforts to reunify the parent with the child are not required. The court shall hold an evidentiary hearing on the motion not later than thirty days after the filing of the motion or may consolidate the hearing with a trial on a petition to terminate parental rights pursuant to section 17a-112. The court may determine that such efforts are not required if the court finds upon clear and convincing evidence that: (1) The parent has subjected the child to the following aggravated circumstances: (A) The child has been abandoned, as defined in subsection (j) of section 17a-112; or (B) the parent has inflicted or knowingly permitted another person to inflict sexual molestation or exploitation or severe physical abuse on the child or engaged in a pattern of abuse of the child; (2) the parent has killed, through deliberate, nonaccidental act, another child of the parent or a sibling of the child, or has requested, commanded, importuned, attempted, conspired or solicited to commit or knowingly permitted another person to commit the killing of the child, another child of the parent or sibling of the child, or has committed or knowingly permitted another person to commit an assault, through deliberate, nonaccidental act, that resulted in serious bodily injury of the child, another child of the parent or a sibling of the child; (3) the parental rights of the parent to a sibling have been terminated within three years of the filing of a petition pursuant to this section, provided the commissioner has made reasonable efforts to reunify the parent with the child during a period of at least ninety days; (4) the parent was convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction of sexual assault, except a conviction of a violation of section 53a-71 or 53a-73a resulting in the conception of the child; or (5) the child was placed in the care and control of the commissioner pursuant to the provisions of sections 17a-57 to 17a-60, inclusive, and section 17a-61.

(c) If the court determines that such efforts are not required, the court shall, at such hearing or at a hearing held not later than thirty days after such determination, approve a permanency plan for such child. The plan may include (1) adoption and a requirement that the commissioner file a petition to terminate parental rights, (2) transfer of guardianship, or (3) for a child sixteen years of age or older, such other planned permanent living arrangement as may be ordered by the court, provided the commissioner has documented a compelling reason why it would not be in the best interests of the child for the permanency plan to include one of the options set forth in subdivision (1) or (2) of this subsection. The child's health and safety shall be of paramount concern in formulating such plan. If the permanency plan for a child sixteen years of age or older includes such other planned permanent living arrangement pursuant to subdivision (3) of this subsection, the provisions of subdivisions (3) to (5), inclusive, of subsection (k) of section 46b-129 shall be applicable.

(d) If the court determines that reasonable efforts to reunify the parent with the child are not required, the Department of Children and Families shall use its best efforts to maintain the child in the initial out-of-home placement, provided the department determines that such placement is in the best interests of the child, until such time as a permanent home for the child is found or the child is placed for adoption. If the permanency plan calls for placing the child for adoption or in some other permanent home, good faith efforts shall be made to place the child for adoption or in some other permanent home.

(P.A. 98-241, S. 7, 18; P.A. 00-137, S. 14; P.A. 01-142, S. 3; P.A. 06-102, S. 6; P.A. 15-51, S. 2; 15-199, S. 2; 15-242, S. 48.)

History: P.A. 98-241 effective July 1, 1998; P.A. 00-137 amended Subsec. (a)(1)(A) to change reference from Sec. 17a-112 (c) to Sec. 17a-112 (j); P.A. 01-142 amended Subsec. (a) by permitting “any other party” to petition court for determination, requiring court to hold evidentiary hearing on petition within 30 days of filing of petition, requiring standard for court to determine that efforts to reunify parent with child are not appropriate to be upon clear and convincing evidence, adding “another child of the parent or” before “a sibling of the child”, and adding Subdiv. (5) re placement of child in care and control of commissioner pursuant to Secs. 17a-57 to 17a-61, inclusive; P.A. 06-102 inserted new Subsec. (a) re commissioner's duty to make reasonable efforts to reunify a parent with a child unless a court approves a permanency plan to the contrary or determines efforts are not required, redesignated existing Subsecs. (a) and (b) as Subsecs. (b) and (c), amended Subsec. (b) to substitute the filing of a motion for a petition and insert provisions re consolidated hearings, amended Subsecs. (b)(1)(B) and (b)(2) to insert “or knowingly permitted another person to inflict”, amended Subsec. (b)(3) to delete “involuntarily” re termination of parental rights to a sibling, amended Subsec. (c) to insert Subdiv. designators and rewrite provisions re adoption, amended Subsec. (c)(2) to permit long-term foster care with a licensed or certified relative and delete independent living as a placement option, inserted new Subsec. (c)(4) re other planned living arrangement as may be ordered by the court, added new Subsec. (d) re duties of department if the court determines that reasonable efforts to reunify the parent and child are not required, and made technical changes and substituted “required” for “appropriate” re reunification efforts throughout; P.A. 15-51 amended Subsec. (c)(2) by deleting “or certified as a relative caregiver”; P.A. 15-199 amended Subsec. (c) by deleting former Subdiv. (2) re long-term foster care with a relative, redesignating existing Subdiv. (3) re transfer of guardianship as Subdiv. (2), redesignating existing Subdiv. (4) as Subdiv. (3) and amending same to add reference to child age 16 or older, adding provision re permanency plan for child age 16 or older, and making a conforming change, effective July 1, 2015; P.A. 15-242 amended Subsec. (b) by replacing “17a-61, inclusive,” with “17a-60, inclusive, and section 17a-61”, effective July 1, 2015.

Finding of reunification efforts not required under this section and Sec. 17a-112(j)(1) is an independent basis on which to terminate parental rights. 322 C. 231. The department is required to make reasonable efforts to reunify a child with one parent and, if reunification is accomplished with one parent, further reunification efforts are not required. 325 C. 833.

The department's duty to make reasonable efforts to reunify the parent with the child arises only when the parent has a reasonable prospect for overcoming the particular statutory ground for termination and, thereafter, reassuming a responsible parental role in the child's life; in assessing the department's efforts to reunify a parent with a child, an important factor to be considered is the degree to which the department complied with all applicable court orders issued for that purpose. 170 CA 833. Plain language of section requires department to make reasonable efforts to reunify the parent with the child unless certain specific conditions are met; where none of the exceptions to the statutory mandate of section apply, the court did not have authority to order that the department cease reunification efforts and Sec. 46b-121(b)(1) does not grant such authority. 221 CA 59.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 80 cases (36 in the last 5 years), 2000–2026 · leading case: Fish v. Fish, 939 A.2d 1040 (Conn. 2008).
Fish v. Fish, 939 A.2d 1040 (Conn. 2008). · cites it 16× “Although we recognize that the clear and convincing standard also is applied in the family law context, including cases involving the termination of parental rights; see General Statutes §§ 17a-111b (b), 17a-112 (i) and (j), and 45a-717 (f) and (g); and the removal of a parent…”
In Re Jorden R., 979 A.2d 469 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 8× “to 2005) § 17a-111b (a) provides in relevant part: “The Commissioner of Children and Families .”
In re Egypt E., 140 A.3d 210 (Conn. 2016). · cites it 12× “Specifically, the petitioner sought a finding, pursu- ant to § 17a-111b (b) (1) (B), that no reunification efforts were required on the basis of the severe physical abuse of Mariam.”
In re Natalie S., 160 A.3d 1056 (Conn. 2017). · cites it 9× “Accordingly, resolution of this appeal requires us to construe General Statutes § 17a-111b 3 and the related statutory scheme.”
In re Egypt E., 175 A.3d 21 (Conn. 2018). · cites it 5× “Pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-111b (a) (2), "[t]he Commissioner of Children and Families shall make reasonable efforts to reunify a parent with a child unless the court .”
In re Adelina A., 148 A.3d 621 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 6× “General Statutes §§ 17a-111b (c) and 46b-129 (k).”
Stuart v. Stuart, 996 A.2d 259 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 2× “any of substantial misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance); General Statutes § 17a-77 (e) (court may issue order of commitment with respect to child if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that child suffers from mental disorder, is in need of hospitalization for…”
In Re Melody L., 962 A.2d 81 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 2× “12 (j) provides: "The Superior Court, upon notice and hearing as provided in sections 45a-716 and 45a-717, may grant a petition filed pursuant to this section if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that (1) the Department of Children and Families has made reasonable…”
In re Unique R., 156 A.3d 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 14× “Therefore, the only means by which this court can conclude that § 17a-112(j)(1) includes such an obligation, as the respondent proposes, is for this court to interpret the phrase "reasonable efforts .”
In re Natalie S., 139 A.3d 824 (Conn. App. Ct. 2016). · cites it 7× “The respondent further argues that her right to continuing services from the department not only is predicated on the specific steps language in § 46b-129 (j)(3), *618 but that it also derives from General Statutes § 17a-111b (a). What is before this court, however, is an appeal…”
In Re Sd, 972 A.2d 258 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 3× “[8] General Statutes § 17a-111b provides in relevant part: "(a) The Commissioner of Children and Families shall make reasonable efforts to reunify a parent with a child unless the court (1) determines that such efforts are not required pursuant to subsection (b) of this section.”
In re Elijah C., 165 A.3d 1149 (Conn. 2017). “* * * "(j) The Superior Court, upon notice and hearing as provided in sections 45a-716 and 45a-717, may grant a petition filed pursuant to this section if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that (1) the Department of Children and Families has made reasonable efforts to…”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-111b(a) — 3 cases
In re Unique R., 156 A.3d 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). “Therefore, the only means by which this court can conclude that § 17a-112(j)(1) includes such an obligation, as the respondent proposes, is for this court to interpret the phrase "reasonable efforts .”
In Re Ashley S., 2000 ME 212 (Me. 2000).
Watley v. Keller (D. Conn. 2019).
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-111b(b) — 1 case
In re Unique R., 156 A.3d 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). “Therefore, the only means by which this court can conclude that § 17a-112(j)(1) includes such an obligation, as the respondent proposes, is for this court to interpret the phrase "reasonable efforts .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.