Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 17a-592 (2026)

(Formerly Sec. 17-257m). Board recommendation to discharge acquittee from custody

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) The superintendent of any hospital for psychiatric disabilities in which an acquittee has been confined or the Commissioner of Developmental Services with whom an acquittee has been placed pursuant to an order of the board or any person or agency responsible for the supervision or treatment of a conditionally released acquittee may request the board to recommend to the court discharge of the acquittee from custody. Any such request shall be accompanied by a report setting forth the facts supporting the request. Within sixty days of receipt of the request, the board shall commence a hearing on the request to recommend discharge. Not less than thirty days prior to such hearing, the board shall send copies of the request and report to the state's attorney and counsel for the acquittee.

(b) The board may, on its own motion, consider whether to recommend discharge of the acquittee from custody. The board shall immediately give notice to the state's attorney and counsel for the acquittee of its decision to consider whether to recommend discharge of the acquittee. The board may order a hearing on whether to recommend discharge of the acquittee and shall order such a hearing if the state's attorney files with the board a request therefor within ten days of his receipt from the board of the notice of its decision to consider whether to make such a recommendation. Any such hearing shall be held within sixty days of the board's decision to consider whether to recommend discharge of the acquittee.

(c) If the board decides to recommend discharge of the acquittee, the board shall make such recommendation pursuant to section 17a-593.

(P.A. 85-506, S. 13, 32; P.A. 87-486, S. 8; P.A. 95-257, S. 48, 58; P.A. 07-73, S. 2(b).)

History: P.A. 87-486 amended Subsec. (a) to authorize the commissioner of mental retardation with whom an acquittee has been placed to request the board to recommend discharge of the acquittee from custody and to require the board to send copies of the request and report not less than 30, rather than 45, days prior to the hearing, and amended Subsec. (c) to replace provision that if the board recommends discharge it shall “apply for discharge” with provision that it shall “make such recommendation” pursuant to Sec. 17-257n; Sec. 17-257m transferred to Sec. 17a-592 in 1991; P.A. 95-257 substituted “psychiatric disabilities” for “mental illness”, effective July 1, 1995; pursuant to P.A. 07-73 “Commissioner of Mental Retardation” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “Commissioner of Developmental Services”, effective October 1, 2007.

Annotations to former section 17-257m:

Cited. 211 C. 591; 215 C. 675.

Cited. 15 CA 74; judgment reversed, see 211 C. 591.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2024 · leading case: Sastrom v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd., 968 A.2d 396 (Conn. 2009).
Sastrom v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd., 968 A.2d 396 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 6× “…provides that a decision by the board that an acquittee should be discharged made pursuant to § 17a-584 (l), 11 or General Statutes § 17a-592 12 or § 17a-593 (d), 13 shall not be subject to judicial *319 review pursuant to § 4-183. 14 Thus, the language of § 17a-597 provides…”
Dyous v. Psychiatric Sec. Review Bd., 826 A.2d 138 (Conn. 2003). “” General Statutes § 17a-584 provides: “At any hearing before the board considering the discharge, conditional release or confinement of the acquittee, except a hearing pursuant to section 17a-592 or subsection (d) of section 17a-593, the board shall make a finding as to the…”
Dyous v. Mental Health & Addiction Servs. (D. Conn. 2024). “§§ 17a-592, 17a-593(a). An acquittee may appeal an adverse decision of the PSRB concerning confinement, conditional release, and temporary leave, to the Connecticut Superior Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.