Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 19a-572 (2026)

Failure to execute document creates no presumption re wishes of patient

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sections 19a-571 and 19a-573 to 19a-575a, inclusive, create no presumption concerning the wishes of a patient who has not executed a document as described in sections 19a-575 and 19a-575a.

(P.A. 85-606, S. 3; P.A. 93-407, S. 6.)

History: P.A. 93-407 added references to Sec. 19a-575a.

Cited. 209 C. 692.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1989–1989 · leading case: McConnell v. Beverly Enter.-Connecticut, Inc., 553 A.2d 596 (Conn. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

McConnell v. Beverly Enter.-Connecticut, Inc., 553 A.2d 596 (Conn. 1989). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 19a-572. The brief filed on behalf of the state’s attorney raises no objections to the trial court’s judgment in this case, but purports to preserve the right to contest such a judgment in other, as yet unspecified, circumstances.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.