Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 22a-226a (2026)
Penalty
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person who knowingly violates any provision of section 22a-252, 22a-208a or 22a-208c, subsection (c) or (d) of section 22a-250, any permit issued under section 22a-208a, any regulation adopted under section 22a-209 or 22a-231, or any order issued pursuant to section 22a-225, shall be fined not more than twenty-five thousand dollars per day for each day of violation or imprisoned not more than two years, or both. A subsequent conviction for any such violation shall be a class D felony, except that such conviction shall carry a fine of not more than fifty thousand dollars per day for each day of violation.
(P.A. 89-270, S. 2; P.A. 90-163, S. 2; 90-312, S. 11; P.A. 91-406, S. 21, 29; P.A. 00-19, S. 2; P.A. 13-258, S. 90.)
History: P.A. 90-163 added reference to Sec. 22a-252; P.A. 90-312 added reference to orders issued pursuant to Sec. 22a-208c; P.A. 91-406 made a technical change; P.A. 00-19 increased terms of imprisonment from one year to two years and from two years to five years, respectively; P.A. 13-258 changed penalty for subsequent conviction by substituting provision re class D felony for provision re imprisonment of not more than 5 years and made technical changes.
Cited. 41 CA 779.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1996–2005 · leading case: Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLC, 881 A.2d 937 (Conn. 2005).
Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLC, 881 A.2d 937 (Conn. 2005). “None of the parties argue that these factors should apply in the present case, however, and the trial court did not identify the factors that entered into its calculations.”
Rocque v. Farricielli, 848 A.2d 1206 (Conn. 2004). “7 million, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 22a-226a and 22a-438 (a), for the operation of unpermitted solid waste disposal areas.”
State v. One 1993 Black Kenworth W-900 Truck & One Trailer, 679 A.2d 13 (Conn. App. Ct. 1996). “On November 3, 1994, the defendant was charged in a substitute information with illegal dumping in violation of General Statutes § 22a-226a. 3 On that day, the *783 state also filed a substitute complaint pursuant to General Statutes § 22a-250a for forfeiture of the vehicle.”
State v. Farricielli, 799 A.2d 1121 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). “In this case, the same conduct formed the basis for the criminal charges under General Statutes § 22a-226a. This “same conduct” consideration, however, is not dispositive and does not render criminal the sanction provided by the statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.