Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 25-1 (2026)

Appointment and qualifications of commission

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 25-1 is repealed.

(1949, Rev., S. 3565, 4041; 1955, S. 1956d; 1957, P.A. 364, S. 2, 3; 1971, P.A. 872, S. 157.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Secs. 25-2 and 25-3. Transferred to Chapter 446i, Secs. 22a-336 and 22a-337, respectively.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1959–2024 · leading case: Rosengarten v. Downes, 802 A.2d 170 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Rosengarten v. Downes, 802 A.2d 170 (Conn. App. Ct. 2002). · cites it 4× “The court explained that although the plaintiff had denominated the case a family relations matter by using a judicial branch code, “F00,” on the summons, neither § 46b-l, the statutory provision that defines the family relations matters within the jurisdiction of the Superior…”

Hepburn v. Brill, 348 Conn. 827 (Conn. 2024). · cites it 3× “See Practice Book § 25-1 (defining ‘‘family matters’’ for purpose of rules of prac- tice).”

Comm'r of Soc. Servs. v. Smith, 830 A.2d 228 (Conn. 2003). · cites it 2× “See Practice Book § 25-1. General Statutes § 46b-231 (n) provides in relevant part: “(1) A person who is aggrieved by a final decision of a family support magistrate is entitled to judicial review by way of appeal under this section.”

Duart v. Dep't of Corr., 34 A.3d 343 (Conn. 2012). · cites it 2× “Practice Book § 25-31 provides: "The provisions of Sections 13-1 through 13-11 inclusive, 13-13 through 13-16 inclusive, and 13-17 through 13-32 of the rules of practice inclusive, shall apply to family matters as defined in Section 25-1." All of the aforementioned sections…”

City of Derby v. Water Resources Comm'n, 172 A.2d 907 (Conn. 1961). · cites it 4× “…a member, with William S. Wise, director of the commission, in attendance. See Rev. 1949, § 4041 (as amended, General Statutes §§25-1, 25-2). After the hearing, the commission found that the plaintiff was “polluting the waters of the State within the meaning of the…”

Walton v. Walton, 227 Conn. App. 251 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024). “shall apply to family matters as defined in Section 25-1.’’ We do not reach the issue of whether Practice Book § 25- 32 trumps Practice Book § 13-4 (f) or vice versa because the defendant did not raise it before the trial court and likewise failed to brief it to this court.”

Westpoint Stevens, Inc. v. Panda-Rosemary Corp., 1999 NCBC 11 (N.C. Bus. Ct. 1999). “C.G.S. § 25-1- 105(1). North Carolina courts interpreting this statute have held that the provision is controlling on choice of law questions in cases arising under the UCC in which the parties did not contractually select which state’s law would control.”

Szestowicki v. Water Resources Comm'n, 156 A.2d 197 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1959). “1958, §§ 25-1, 25-3, 25-5, 25-7. Although the statutes fixing the powers and duties of the water resources commission seem to emphasize flood control, erosion and pollution on navigable streams, it is also clear that it has jurisdiction over river and harbor improvements,…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.