Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 3-13 (2026)

Assistant treasurer for debt management. Additional assistant treasurer

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The Treasurer shall appoint an assistant treasurer for debt management. Such assistant shall be sworn to the faithful discharge of his duties. He shall, under the direction of the Treasurer oversee the general financing procedure in the borrowing of money by the state and perform such other duties as the Treasurer may direct. The Treasurer may appoint an additional assistant treasurer as necessary for the efficient conduct of the business of the Treasurer. Such assistant treasurers shall be in the unclassified service and may be removed by the Treasurer.

(1953, June, 1955, S. 36d; P.A. 73-594, S. 10, 12; P.A. 74-324, S. 1, 2; P.A. 87-518, S. 3, 5.)

History: P.A. 73-594 replaced reference to repealed chapter 63 with reference to chapter 67 and removed language referring to deputy treasurer's duties as investment officer, adding general language concerning duties; P.A. 74-324 created deputy treasurer for debt management, thereby distinguishing between this section and Sec. 3-12; P.A. 87-518 authorized treasurer to appoint an assistant treasurer, instead of a deputy treasurer, for debt management, repealed provision that such appointment be subject to provisions of chapter 67 and authorized appointment of an additional assistant treasurer.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1987–1995 · leading case: Motor Veh. Mfrs. Ass'n of the United States, Inc. v. O'Neill, 523 A.2d 486 (Conn. 1987).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Motor Veh. Mfrs. Ass'n of the United States, Inc. v. O'Neill, 523 A.2d 486 (Conn. 1987). “Tribe, American Constitutional Law (1978) § 3-13. A party mounting a constitutional challenge to the validity of a statute must provide an adequate factual record in order to meet its burden of demonstrating the statute’s adverse impact on some protected interest of its own, in…”

Fonfara v. Reapportionment Comm'n, 610 A.2d 153 (Conn. 1992). “1988) § 3-13, p. 96 and see id., pp. 96-97. The last three considerations reflect a “prudential” view, which would avoid adjudication “when reaching the merits would force the Court to compromise an important principle or would undermine the Court’s authority.”

Nielsen v. Kezer, 652 A.2d 1013 (Conn. 1995). “1988) § 3-13, p. 96. Although § 9-382 authorizes political parties to choose candidates pursuant to its rules, it also directs that the selection process be conducted “in a manner conforming with applicable law .”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.