Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 30 — INTOXICATING LIQUORS · Chapter 545 — Liquor Control Act
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 30-3 (2026)

Assistance

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The department may appoint a secretary and may employ such clerks, inspectors, agents and other assistants as it requires.

(1949 Rev., S. 4224; P.A. 77-614, S. 165, 610; P.A. 78-303, S. 80, 136; P.A. 99-194, S. 21.)

History: P.A. 77-614 called for replacement of liquor control commission with division of liquor control within the department of business regulation, but P.A. 78-303 made exception for this section, retaining the commission; P.A. 99-194 replaced reference to commission with reference to department.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2021 · leading case: Matter of Est. of Edwards, 343 S.E.2d 913 (N.C. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Matter of Est. of Edwards, 343 S.E.2d 913 (N.C. 1986). · cites it 27× “C.G.S. § 30-3, "Effect of dissent," provides in pertinent part: (b) Whenever the surviving spouse is a second or successive spouse, he or she shall take only one half of the amount provided by the Intestate Succession Act for the surviving spouse if the testator has surviving…”
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Strong, 89 A.3d 392 (Conn. App. Ct. 2014). “2011) § 30-3, p. 401. “ ‘The law of trusts limits the ability of a borrower to challenge whether conditions in the pooling and servicing agreement were satisfied.”
Goshen Mortg., LLC v. Androulidakis, 205 Conn. App. 15 (Conn. App. Ct. 2021). “2019) § 30-3, pp. 467–68. Accordingly, the court did not err in declining to address the defendant’s argu- ments concerning the plaintiff’s status with the SEC.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 30-3(b) — 1 case
Matter of Est. of Edwards, 343 S.E.2d 913 (N.C. 1986). “C.G.S. § 30-3, "Effect of dissent," provides in pertinent part: (b) Whenever the surviving spouse is a second or successive spouse, he or she shall take only one half of the amount provided by the Intestate Succession Act for the surviving spouse if the testator has surviving…”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 30-3(d) — 1 case
Matter of Est. of Edwards, 343 S.E.2d 913 (N.C. 1986). “C.G.S. § 30-3, "Effect of dissent," provides in pertinent part: (b) Whenever the surviving spouse is a second or successive spouse, he or she shall take only one half of the amount provided by the Intestate Succession Act for the surviving spouse if the testator has surviving…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.