Corey v. Avco-Lycoming Div., 307 A.2d 155 (Conn. 1972). · cites it 4דThe plaintiff also assigns error in the court's conclusion that the hearing tribunal's findings are not supported by the evidence before it.”
City of Groton v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 362 A.2d 1359 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 8דGeneral Statutes §31-128 (a). It *111 is true that either the respondent or the original complainant may now appeal from the action of the hearing tribunal.”
Evening Sentinel v. Nat'l Org. for Women, 357 A.2d 498 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 4דThe court found that there was *28 substantial and competent evidence submitted to the hearing tribunal that the plaintiffs aided and abetted the doing of acts declared to be unfair employment practices under General Statutes § 31-126, being a portion of chapter 563, the…”
City of Hartford v. Freedom of Info. Comm'n, 518 A.2d 49 (Conn. 1986). “The original version of House Bill 6938 included “political subdivision” in the definition of “employer,” but the House of Representatives amended the bill before its passage to delete the reference to “political subdivision.”
Town of West Hartford v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 407 A.2d 964 (Conn. 1978). · cites it 2דIn that court, and in the proceedings here, the claim of unequal pay has become, without objection, the surrogate for the totality of monetary relief awarded by the hearing tribunal.”
Veeder-Root Co. v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 334 A.2d 443 (Conn. 1973). · cites it 2דAlcorn, a state referee, and, as required by § 31-128, the issues were heard by him acting as a court on the record certified by the defendant.”
Smith v. Perkin-Elmer Corp., 373 F. Supp. 930 (D. Conn. 1973). · cites it 2דMoreover, the Connecticut statute has a feature that makes it particularly inappropriate: complainants must wait until they are “aggrieved” by a final order of the hearing tribunal or by dismissal of complaints before bringing suit, and the tribunal’s findings, if supported by…”
Connecticut Inst. for Blind v. Connecticut Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 405 A.2d 618 (Conn. 1978). “Blanket exclusions, no matter how well motivated, fly in the face of the command to individuate that is central to fair employment practices. The trial court therefore erred when it sustained the plaintiff’s appeal and denied the complainant’s claim of discrimination.”
Scovill Mfg. Co. v. Comm'n on Civil Rights, 215 A.2d 130 (Conn. 1965). · cites it 2דScovill filed a petition in the Superior Court to review the hearing tribunal’s order; General Statutes § 31-128 (d); and from an adverse judgment by that court it has taken this appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.