Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-301c (2026)

Costs of appeal. Interest added to award affirmed on appeal

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) No costs shall be taxed in favor of either party on any such appeal either in the Compensation Review Board or in the Appellate Court, and no party shall be liable to pay any fees or costs in connection therewith, except the record fee on appeal to the Supreme Court; provided, if an appeal is taken to the Appellate Court from a decision of the Compensation Review Board, and such appeal is found by said court to be either frivolous or taken for the purpose of vexation or delay, said court may tax costs in its discretion against the person so taking the appeal.

(b) Whenever an employer or his insurer appeals an administrative law judge's award, and upon completion of the appeal process the employer or insurer loses such appeal, the Compensation Review Board or the Appellate Court, as the case may be, shall add interest on the amount of such award affirmed on appeal and not paid to the claimant during the pendency of such appeal, from the date of the original award to the date of the final appeal decision, at the rate prescribed in section 37-3a.

(P.A. 79-540, S. 6; June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-29, S. 30, 82; P.A. 84-288; P.A. 89-316, S. 2; P.A. 91-339, S. 23, 55; P.A. 21-18, S. 1.)

History: June Sp. Sess. P.A. 83-29 deleted reference to appellate session of the superior court and added reference to appellate court; P.A. 84-288 added Subsec. (b), which provides that the final arbiter of an appeal on an award shall add 6% interest to the amount of the award which is unpaid and affirmed by his decision; P.A. 89-316 amended Subsec. (b) to change the rate of interest from 6% per annum to the rate “prescribed in section 37-3a”; P.A. 91-339 changed “compensation review division” to “compensation review board”; pursuant to P.A. 21-18, “commissioner's” was changed editorially by the Revisors to “administrative law judge's” in Subsec. (b), effective October 1, 2021.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2002–2010 · leading case: Donahue v. Town of Southington, 792 A.2d 76 (Conn. 2002).
Donahue v. Town of Southington, 792 A.2d 76 (Conn. 2002). · cites it 4× “The judgment is affirmed and the case is remanded to the compensation review board with direction to establish the rate of interest and to calculate the amount of the award of interest pursuant to General Statutes § 31-301c (b). In this opinion the other justices concurred.”
Hummel v. Marten Transp., Ltd., 970 A.2d 834 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009). · cites it 3× “” 22 The defendants also claim that General Statutes § 31-301c (b) provides the appropriate penalty for failed appeals and that the legislature did not intend for both statutes to apply to awards on appeal.”
Jones v. Town of Redding, 995 A.2d 51 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 2× “13 Pursuant to General Statutes § 31-301c (b), the board also awarded the plaintiff interest for any benefits due to him from the defendant that remained unpaid pending appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.