Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-308b (2026)

Dependency allowance

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 31-308b is repealed.

(1967, P.A. 842, S. 22; 1969, P.A. 696, S. 9; P.A. 76-217; P.A. 80-284, S. 3; P.A. 91-32, S. 27, 31; 91-339, S. 52, 55.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases, 1985–2004 · leading case: In re Valerie D., 613 A.2d 748 (Conn. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re Valerie D., 613 A.2d 748 (Conn. 1992). · cites it 2× “l, quoting General Statutes § 31-308b (1); on the established principle that the act “is remedial in nature and that it should be broadly construed .”

Crook v. Academy Drywall Co., 591 A.2d 429 (Conn. 1991). · cites it 11× “The sole issue presented in this appeal is whether an employee who suffers a compensable injury is eligible under General Statutes § 31-308b 1 to *29 receive a dependency allowance for a child born after the date of the employee’s injury but conceived prior *30 to the date of…”

Wesson v. City of Milford, 498 A.2d 505 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985). “General Statutes § 31-275 (4) provides “ ‘Dependent,’ except as provided in section 31-308b, means a member of the injured employee’s family or next of kin who was wholly or partly dependent upon the earnings of the employee at the time of the injury.”

Trinkley v. Ella Grasso Reg'l Ctr., 601 A.2d 515 (Conn. 1992). “l medical and hospital costs, a pro rata portion of the compensation rate based upon the ratio of the amount of wages paid by him to the total wages paid the employee in such average week but not less than an amount equal to the minimum compensation rate prevailing at the time…”

Florence v. Town of Plainfield, 849 A.2d 7 (Conn. Super. Ct. 2004). · cites it 2× “l, quoting General Statutes § 31-308b (1); on the established principle that the act is remedial in nature and that it should be broadly construed .”

Wislocki v. Town of Prospect, 619 A.2d 842 (Conn. 1993). “l medical and hospital costs, a pro rata portion of the compensation rate based upon the ratio of the amount of wages paid by him to the total wages paid the employee in such average week but not less than an amount equal to the minimum compensation rate prevailing at the time…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.