Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 31-326 (2026)

Proceedings against delinquent insurance companies or employers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Whenever the chairperson of the Workers' Compensation Commission finds that any insurance company or association insuring the liability of an employer under the provisions of this chapter is conducting such business improperly or is dilatory in investigating and adjusting claims or making payments, or fails to comply with the provisions of this chapter or the rules, methods or procedure and forms adopted by the chairperson, the chairperson shall notify the Insurance Commissioner, in writing, setting forth the facts, and thereupon the Insurance Commissioner shall fix a time and place for a hearing thereon, giving reasonable notice to the chairperson and to such company or association of such hearing, and, if he finds the allegations to be true, he shall either suspend for a time or revoke the license of such company or association to transact such business in this state. Whenever an administrative law judge has reason to believe that any employer who has furnished proof of his financial ability or filed with the Insurance Commissioner security for the performance of the obligations of this chapter in accordance with section 31-284 is dilatory in investigating or adjusting claims or in making payments, or fails to comply with the provisions of this chapter or the rules, methods of procedure and forms adopted by the chairperson, he may notify the Insurance Commissioner, in writing, setting forth the facts, and thereupon the Insurance Commissioner shall fix the time and place for a hearing thereon, giving reasonable notice to the administrative law judge and to such employer, and, if he finds the allegations to be true, then, after ten days from the notice of such findings to such employer, the compliance of such employer with the terms of section 31-284 shall be, as to any future injuries, null and void.

(1949 Rev., S. 7466; 1958 Rev., S. 31-193; 1961, P.A. 491, S. 52; P.A. 77-614, S. 163, 610; P.A. 80-482, S. 205, 348; P.A. 91-339, S. 33, 55; P.A. 21-18, S. 1; P.A. 22-89, S. 26.)

History: 1961 act entirely replaced previous provisions; P.A. 77-614 made insurance department a division within the department of business regulation with insurance commissioner as its head, effective January 1, 1979; P.A. 80-482 reinstated insurance division as an independent department with commissioner as its head and deleted reference to abolished department of business regulation; P.A. 91-339 changed “compensation commissioners, or a majority of them” to “chairman of the workers' compensation commission”; pursuant to P.A. 21-18, “commissioner” and “compensation commissioner” were changed editorially by the Revisors to “administrative law judge”, effective October 1, 2021; P.A. 22-89 made technical changes, effective May 24, 2022.

Cited. 28 CS 5.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1967–1985 · leading case: Fellin v. Adm'r, 493 A.2d 174 (Conn. 1985).
Fellin v. Adm'r, 493 A.2d 174 (Conn. 1985). · cites it 2× “” General Statutes § 31-326 provides in relevant part: “An individual shall be ineligible for benefits .”
Bartolotta v. United States, 276 F. Supp. 66 (D. Conn. 1967). “…); § 31-327 (payment of fees and expenses by employer or insurer); § *72 31-341 (notice of compensation hearing sent to insurer to be the same as one sent to employer and insurer to be party to the hearing); § 31-343 (certain defenses not available to insurer against an…”
Barrette v. Travelers Ins., 246 A.2d 102 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1968). “…§ 31-296 (in a suggested form); § 31-300 (interest penalties due to fault or neglect of employer or insurer); § 31-326 (proceedings against delinquent insurance companies or employers); § 31-327 (payment of fees and expenses by employer or insurer); § 31-341 (notice of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.