Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 33-898 (2026)

Receivership or custodianship

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) Unless an election to purchase has been filed under section 33-900, a court in a judicial proceeding brought to dissolve a corporation may appoint one or more receivers to wind up and liquidate, or one or more custodians to manage, the business and affairs of the corporation. The court shall hold a hearing, after notifying all parties to the proceeding and any interested persons designated by the court, before appointing a receiver or custodian. The court appointing a receiver or custodian has jurisdiction over the corporation and all of its property wherever located.

(b) The court may appoint an individual or a domestic or foreign corporation authorized to transact business in this state as a receiver or custodian. The court may require the receiver or custodian to post bond, with or without sureties, in an amount the court directs.

(c) The court shall describe the powers and duties of the receiver or custodian in its appointing order, which may be amended from time to time. Among other powers: (1) The receiver (A) may dispose of all or any part of the assets of the corporation wherever located, at a public or private sale, if authorized by the court, and (B) may sue and defend in his own name as receiver of the corporation in all courts of this state; (2) the custodian may exercise all of the powers of the corporation, through or in place of its board of directors or officers, to the extent necessary to manage the affairs of the corporation in the best interests of its shareholders and creditors.

(d) The court during a receivership may redesignate the receiver a custodian, and during a custodianship may redesignate the custodian a receiver, if doing so is in the best interests of the corporation, its shareholders and creditors.

(e) The court from time to time during the receivership or custodianship may order compensation paid and expenses paid or reimbursed to the receiver or custodian from the assets of the corporation or proceeds from the sale of the assets.

(P.A. 94-186, S. 175, 215; P.A. 09-55, S. 25.)

History: P.A. 94-186 effective January 1, 1997; P.A. 09-55 amended Subsec. (a) to add “Unless an election to purchase has been filed under section 33-900” and provide that court has “jurisdiction” over the corporation and its property, rather than “exclusive jurisdiction”, and amended Subsec. (e) to authorize court to order “expenses paid or reimbursed to the receiver or custodian” rather than “expense disbursements or reimbursements made to the receiver or custodian and his counsel”.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2021 · leading case: Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004).
Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 4× “exclusive”); General Statutes § 33-898 (a) (“court appointing a receiver or custodian has exclusive jurisdiction”); General Statutes § 33-1189 (a) (same); General Statutes § 36a-187 (b) (“superior court for the judicial district of Hartford .”
Wittman v. Intense Movers, Inc., 202 Conn. App. 87 (Conn. App. Ct. 2021). · cites it 2× “The plaintiffs sought, inter alia, (1) pursuant to General Statutes § 33-896 (a) (1), a judicial dissolution of the company, (2) pursuant to General Statutes § 33-897 (c), the appointment of a receiver pendente lite, (3) pursuant to General Statutes § 33-898, the appointment of…”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 33-898(a) — 1 case
Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004). “exclusive”); General Statutes § 33-898 (a) (“court appointing a receiver or custodian has exclusive jurisdiction”); General Statutes § 33-1189 (a) (same); General Statutes § 36a-187 (b) (“superior court for the judicial district of Hartford .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.