Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 34 — · Chapter 613a — Uniform Limited Liability Company Act
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 34-243 (2026)

Short title: Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sections 34-243 to 34-283d, inclusive, may be cited as the “Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act”.

(P.A. 16-97, S. 1.)

History: P.A. 16-97 effective July 1, 2017.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 2017–2026 · leading case: McKay v. Longman, 211 A.3d 20 (Conn. 2019).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McKay v. Longman, 211 A.3d 20 (Conn. 2019). · cites it 4× “The legislature has since repealed the Connecticut Limited Liability Company Act, effective July 1, 2017, and replaced it with the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, General Statutes § 34-243 et seq. 2 Longman and the corporate defendants, and the plaintiff,…”
Manere v. Collins, 200 Conn. App. 356 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020). · cites it 6× “1 Turning to the statute at issue in the present case, we note that the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (CULLCA), General Statutes § 34-243 et seq., does not define ‘‘oppression.”
Saunders v. Briner, 334 Conn. 135 (Conn. 2019). · cites it 4× “Our legislature has since repealed the CLLCA, effective July 1, 2017, and replaced it with the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, General Statutes § 34-243 et seq. 2 Revere Investments, LLC, Revere High Yield GP, LLC, Madison Mott, Inc.”
SLSJ, LLC v. Kleban, 277 F. Supp. 3d 258 (D. Conn. 2017). · cites it 2× “, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 34-243 , et seq. (“The Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Act”); § 34-255h ("Standards of conduct for members and managers”); and § 34-255Í ("Rights of member, manager and person disassociated as member to information”).”
Benjamin v. Island Mgmt., LLC, 341 Conn. 189 (Conn. 2021). · cites it 2× “The principal issue in this appeal is one of first impression regarding the conditions under which a member of a manager-managed limited liability company (LLC) is permitted to inspect the LLC’s books and records pursuant to General Statutes § 34-255i,1 a provision of the…”
N.E. Constr. Co., LLC v. Anton (Conn. App. Ct. 2026). · cites it 9× “In their motion, they argued that the court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the action because the plaintiff was dissolved on Janu- ary 21, 2020, and ceased to be a legal entity under the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (CULLCA), General Statutes §…”
Bongiorno v. J & G Realty, LLC (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 3× “This court, confronted by the very limited evidence of post-July 1, 2017 finances, will not apply the Connecticut [Uniform] Limited Liability Company Act [(CULLCA), General Statutes § 34-243 et seq.], in this memorandum of decision.”
Paquette v. Thompson (Conn. App. Ct. 2026). · cites it 3× “) “In their July 24, 2023, statement of claim, Thomp- son and [Westwood Lane] assert that the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act [(CULLCA)], General Statutes § 34-243 et seq., effective July 1, 2017 .”
McKay v. Longman (Conn. 2019). · cites it 2× “The legislature has since repealed the Connecticut Limited Liability Company Act, effective July 1, 2017, and replaced it with the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, General Statutes § 34-243 et seq. 2 Longman and the corporate defendants, and the plaintiff,…”
Saunders v. Briner (Conn. 2019). · cites it 2× “3d 257 (2016); accord General Statutes § 34-243 et seq. (provi- sions of Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Com- pany Act, effective July 1, 2017).”
D2E Holdings, LLC v. Corp. for Urban Home Ownership of New Haven (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 2× “was repealed and replaced by the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, General Statutes § 34-243 et seq.; (2) whether the terms of the management agreement permitted assignment; (3) whether Dragon Bridge was member-managed or manager-managed, as its operating…”
Fischer v. People's United Bank, N.A. (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 2× “The court also held that, even though AJC’s operating agreement does not specif- ically address a single member’s authority to commence litigation on behalf of AJC, any ambiguity is resolved by the Connecticut Uniform Limited Liability Company Act (CULLCA), General Statutes §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.