Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 36a-50 (2026)

Enforcement action. Notice and hearing. Civil penalty. Injunction, restraining order and writ. Restitution and disgorgement. Costs

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)(1) Whenever the commissioner finds as the result of an investigation that any person has violated any provision of the general statutes within the jurisdiction of the commissioner, or any regulation, rule or order adopted or issued thereunder, the commissioner may send a notice to such person by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by any express delivery carrier that provides a dated delivery receipt, unless such person is licensed by or registered with the commissioner, in which case the notice may be provided by personal delivery, as defined in section 4-166, in accordance with section 36a-52a. The notice shall be deemed received by the person on the earlier of the date of actual receipt or seven days after mailing or sending, and in the case of a notice sent by electronic mail, the notice shall be deemed received by the person in accordance with section 36a-52a. Any such notice shall include: (A) A statement of the time, place, and nature of the hearing; (B) a statement of the legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held; (C) a reference to the particular sections of the general statutes, regulations, rules or orders alleged to have been violated; (D) a short and plain statement of the matters asserted; (E) the maximum penalty that may be imposed for such violation; and (F) a statement indicating that such person may file a written request for a hearing on the matters asserted not later than fourteen days after receipt of the notice.

(2) If a hearing is requested within the time specified in the notice, the commissioner shall hold a hearing upon the matters asserted in the notice unless such person fails to appear at the hearing. After the hearing, if the commissioner finds that the person has violated any such provision, regulation, rule or order, the commissioner may, in the commissioner's discretion and in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, order that a civil penalty not exceeding one hundred thousand dollars per violation be imposed upon such person. If such person does not request a hearing within the time specified in the notice or fails to appear at the hearing, the commissioner may, as the facts require, order that a civil penalty not exceeding one hundred thousand dollars per violation be imposed upon such person.

(3) Each action undertaken by the commissioner under this subsection shall be in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54.

(b) Whenever it appears to the commissioner that any such person has violated, is violating or is about to violate any such provision, regulation, rule or order, the commissioner may, in the commissioner's discretion and in addition to any other remedy authorized by law: (1) Bring an action in the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford to enjoin the acts or practices and to enforce compliance with any such provision, regulation, rule or order. Upon a proper showing, a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or writ of mandamus shall be granted and a receiver or conservator may be appointed for such person or such person's assets. The court shall not require the commissioner to post a bond; (2) seek a court order imposing a penalty not to exceed one hundred thousand dollars per violation against any such person found to have violated any such provision, regulation, rule or order; or (3) apply to the superior court for the judicial district of Hartford for an order of restitution whereby such person shall be ordered to make restitution of any sums shown by the commissioner to have been obtained by such person in violation of any such provision, regulation, rule or order, plus interest at the rate set forth in section 37-3a. Such restitution shall, at the option of the court, be payable to the receiver or conservator appointed pursuant to this subsection, or directly to the person whose assets were obtained in violation of any such provision, regulation, rule or order. Whenever the commissioner prevails in any action brought under this subsection, the court may allow to the state its costs.

(c) Whenever the commissioner finds as the result of an investigation that any person has violated any provision of the general statutes within the jurisdiction of the commissioner, or any regulation, rule or order adopted or issued under such provisions, the commissioner may, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, order such person to (1) make restitution of any sums shown to have been obtained in violation of any such provision, regulation, rule or order plus interest at the legal rate set forth in section 37-1; (2) provide disgorgement of any sums shown to have been obtained in violation of any such provision, regulation, rule or order; or (3) both make restitution and provide disgorgement in accordance with subdivisions (1) and (2) of this subsection. After the commissioner issues such an order, the person named in the order may, not later than fourteen days after the receipt of such order, file a written request for a hearing. The order shall be deemed received by the person on the earlier of the date of actual receipt or seven days after mailing or sending. Any such hearing shall be held in accordance with the provisions of chapter 54.

(d) The provisions of this section shall not apply to chapters 672a, 672b and 672c.

(P.A. 88-230, S. 1, 12; P.A. 90-98, S. 1, 2; P.A. 93-142, S. 4, 7, 8; 93-194, S. 6, 7; P.A. 94-122, S. 26, 340; P.A. 95-220, S. 4–6; P.A. 01-34, S. 10; 01-48, S. 8; P.A. 03-259, S. 2; P.A. 12-96, S. 5; P.A. 17-233, S. 3; P.A. 21-130, S. 12.)

History: P.A. 93-194 effective June 23, 1993 (Revisor's note: P.A. 88-230, P.A. 90-98 and P.A. 93-142 authorized substitution of “judicial district of Hartford” for “judicial district of Hartford-New Britain” in public acts of the 1993 session of the general assembly, to take effect September 1, 1996); P.A. 94-122 gave the commissioner general authority to enforce statutes within his jurisdiction and clarified what the notice and hearing must contain and when the notice is deemed received in Subsec. (a)(1), deleted the requirement that the order be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to any person named in the order and allowed state court costs in Subsec. (b), and moved Subsec. (c) re administrative procedures to new Subsec. (a)(3), effective January 1, 1995; P.A. 95-220 changed effective date of P.A. 88-230 from September 1, 1996, to September 1, 1998, effective July 1, 1995; P.A. 01-34 amended Subsec. (a)(2) by adding provisions re civil penalty for violation of Secs. 36a-746b to 36a-746g; P.A. 01-48 amended Subsec. (a)(1) by adding provisions re express delivery; P.A. 03-259 amended Subsec. (a)(2) to increase civil penalties from $7,500 per violation and $15,000 per violation of Secs. 36a-746b to 36a-746g, inclusive, to $100,000 per violation and amended Subsec. (b)(2) to increase penalty that may be imposed by court order from $7,500 to $100,000 per violation and replace “violated any order issued by the commissioner” with “violated any such provision, regulation, rule or order”; P.A. 12-96 amended Subsec. (a)(1)(F) by making a technical change, added new Subsec. (c) permitting commissioner to order restitution or disgorgement and redesignated existing Subsec. (c) as Subsec. (d); P.A. 17-233 amended Subsec. (a)(1) by adding provisions re commissioner may provide notice to licensee by personal delivery and notice sent by electronic mail deemed received in accordance with Sec. 36a-52a; P.A. 21-130 amended Subsec. (a)(1) by adding “or registered with” re notice by personal delivery, effective July 1, 2021.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 13 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2024 · leading case: Solomon v. Gilmore, 731 A.2d 280 (Conn. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Solomon v. Gilmore, 731 A.2d 280 (Conn. 1999). · cites it 8× “Moreover, the penalties available to the commissioner for violations of the secondary mortgage act are governed by General Statutes § 36a-50, 20 and are the same as those available for any violation of the banking laws of this state.”

Rollins v. People's Bank Corp., 925 A.2d 315 (Conn. 2007). · cites it 14× “, General Statutes § 36a-50 (a) (1) and (2) 11 (authorizing commissioner to investigate, prosecute and impose fines of up to $100,000 per violation for violations of state banking *150 laws); General Statutes § 36a-50 (b) 12 (authorizing commissioner to bring action in court to…”

Burke v. Fleet Nat'l Bank, 742 A.2d 293 (Conn. 1999). · cites it 6× “Thereafter, the commissioner, invoking General Statutes §§ 36a-50 5 *6 and 36a-52, 6 issued atemporary ex parte order and notice *7 of hearing, claiming that Fleet, First Union and Bank-Boston were in violation of § 36a-156 by imposing ATM nondepositor fees, and ordering those…”

D' Angelo Dev. & Constr. Co. v. Cordovano, 897 A.2d 81 (Conn. 2006). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 36a-517 (allowing banking commissioner to proceed under General Statutes §§ 36a-50 and 36a-52, latter of which authorizes banking commissioner to issue temporary cease and desist order); see Solomon v.”

Lemire v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP, 256 F.R.D. 321 (D. Conn. 2009). · cites it 2× “Engaging in collection of consumer debts without a license constitutes a violation that may be punished by the Banking Commissioner, Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 36a-50, -804, -806 to -808, and incurs liability that can be enforced by the state’s attorney.”

1st All. Lending, LLC v. Dept. of Banking, 342 Conn. 273 (Conn. 2022). · cites it 2× “We note, however, that, although General Statutes § 36a-50 permits the imposition of a civil penalty, it does not appear to provide for license revocation.”

Ballou v. Law Offices Howard Lee Schiff, 39 A.3d 1075 (Conn. 2012). · cites it 2× “, General Statutes § 4-61(a) (involving actions against state on highway and public works contracts); General Statutes § 12-159a (a) (involving court orders in actions contesting validity of tax collector's deed); General Statutes § 31-300 (involving awards in workers'…”

State Farm Bank, F.S.B. v. Burke, 445 F. Supp. 2d 207 (D. Conn. 2006). “at §§ 36a-50, 36a-52. Additionally, the Commissioner has construed the Connecticut Uniform Securities Act (“CUSA”), Conn.”

Am. Fin. Servs. Assn. v. Burke, 169 F. Supp. 2d 62 (D. Conn. 2001). · cites it 2× “See Connecticut Act § 10; see generally Conn. Gen.Stat. § 36a-50. 10. Defendant Banking Commissioner intends to enforce section 5(7) of the Act in a manner consistent with its text.”

1st All. Lending, LLC v. Dept. of Banking, 229 Conn. App. 664 (Conn. App. Ct. 2024). “Surrender of a license shall not affect the licensee’s civil or criminal liability, or affect the commissioner’s ability to impose an administrative penalty on the licensee pursuant to section 36a-50 for acts committed prior to the surrender.”

Solomon v. Gilmore, 707 A.2d 746 (Conn. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 6× “, General Statutes § 36a-50 (b). 8 The defendant can provide no legal authority to support his claim that noncompliance with the licensing statute precludes a foreclosure action by rendering the loan or the mortgage illegal or unenforceable.”

Comm'r of Banking v. Haynes, 821 A.2d 843 (Conn. App. Ct. 2003). · cites it 11× “When the landlord did not make payment as ordered, the commissioner filed an action seeking to enforce the order pursuant to General Statutes § 36a-50 (b) (1) and seeking the levy of an additional penalty, pursuant to § 36a-50 (b) (2), for the landlord’s failure to adhere to the…”

Show all 13 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.