Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-702 (2026)

(Formerly Sec. 38-69). Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 38a-702 is repealed, effective September 1, 2002.

(1949 Rev., S. 6057; 1967, P.A. 526, S. 3; P.A. 90-243, S. 22; P.A. 94-160, S. 3, 24; P.A. 95-79, S. 145, 146, 189; P.A. 96-227, S. 11; P.A. 97-317, S. 2, 4; P.A. 01-113, S. 41, 42.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1999–2005 · leading case: Sheltry v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 247 F. Supp. 2d 169 (D. Conn. 2003).
Sheltry v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 247 F. Supp. 2d 169 (D. Conn. 2003). · cites it 4× “As discussed infra, Newton was licensed by the State to sell various insurance products for thirteen different insurance companies and, as such, was authorized to act as an agent for these companies for purposes of soliciting contracts of insurance for them.”
Biller Assocs. v. Rte. 156 Realty Co., 725 A.2d 398 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999). “to 1987) § 38-69 (now § 38a-702) and regulations enacted by the insurance commissioner in effect at the time the contract was executed, 1 the employment contract was unenforceable because, as a condition precedent to its enforceability, the defendant must be named as an insured…”
Charts v. Nationwide Mut. Ins., 397 F. Supp. 2d 357 (D. Conn. 2005). “ii) The Connecticut Insurance Code Nationwide next argues that because insurance companies and their agents are subject to extensive regulation by the Connecticut Insurance Code, § 38a-702 et seq., the Connecticut legislature could not have intended for insurance agents to also…”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-702(2) — 1 case
Sheltry v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am., 247 F. Supp. 2d 169 (D. Conn. 2003). “As discussed infra, Newton was licensed by the State to sell various insurance products for thirteen different insurance companies and, as such, was authorized to act as an agent for these companies for purposes of soliciting contracts of insurance for them.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.