Go Syfert

Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 4-189 (2026)

Repeal of inconsistent provisions

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any provisions in the general statutes that are inconsistent with the provisions of this chapter are repealed, provided nothing contained in this chapter shall be deemed to repeal provisions in the general statutes that provide for the confidentiality of records.

(P.A. 73-620, S. 15, 19; P.A. 88-317, S. 96, 107.)

History: P.A. 88-317 substituted “chapter” for “section” in the “provided” clause, effective July 1, 1989, and applicable to all agency proceedings commencing on or after that date.

Cited. 168 C. 435; Id., 504; 172 C. 263. Section has no more force than doctrine of repeal by implication; does note repeal Sec. 4-164(b). Id., 603. Cited. 173 C. 352; 181 C. 69; 186 C. 153; 191 C. 173; 204 C. 672; 232 C. 181.

Cited. 1 CA 1; 18 CA 13; 30 CA 720.

Secs. 16-35 to 16-39, inclusive, not repealed by this section. 31 CS 65. Cited. 38 CS 24; 41 CS 271.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Secs. 4-189a to 4-189g. Reserved for future use.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 7 cases, 1975–1995 · leading case: Connecticut Life & Health Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Jackson, 377 A.2d 1099 (Conn. 1977).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Connecticut Life & Health Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Jackson, 377 A.2d 1099 (Conn. 1977). · cites it 3× “Furthermore, as we discussed above, the plain intent of the legislature in enacting the UAPA was to permit agencies to decide questions of law and to designate agencies, along with the Court of Common Pleas, as the principal forums for declaratory relief.”

McDermott v. Comm'r of Child. & Youth Servs., 363 A.2d 103 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 8× “3 Where the preexisting statutes cannot be construed as consistent with the UAPA those statutes are repealed by virtue of § 4-189. 4 Beading the UAPA and Murphy we find that the act was designed for two purposes.”

Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Windsor Hall Rest Home, 653 A.2d 181 (Conn. 1995). · cites it 4× “As we discuss more fully later in this opinion, there is no language in the statutes and regulations governing the commission that specifically mandates a decision in writing and prohibits an oral decision; compare id., 607 (“no review” language governing decisions of commission…”

Hirschfeld v. Comm'n on Claims, 376 A.2d 71 (Conn. 1977). · cites it 3× “§ 4-166. Addressing the House before passage of the bill, Representative David H.”

Lee v. Bd. of Educ., 434 A.2d 333 (Conn. 1980). · cites it 2× “That the legislature intended the UAPA to establish a single uniform procedure for administrative agencies covered by the act is evidenced by the broad language of § 4-189 repealing ‘‘[a]ny provisions in the general statutes which are inconsistent with [the act].”

Control Module, Inc. v. Groppo, 567 A.2d 1264 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1989). · cites it 2× “y judgment: (1) § 12-221a, whieh vests the tax commissioner with the power to adopt another method of apportionment, when the § 12-218 method of apportionment subjects the company to taxation on a lesser portion of its net income than is “equitably attributable” to the state,…”

Carling Elec., Inc. v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 362 A.2d 967 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 4-183 (g) concerning judicial review states in pertinent part: “The court may affirm the decision of the agency or remand the case for further proceedings.” Since the original judgment was within the court’s power and it was not required to grant the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.