Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 44 — HOTEL AND INN KEEPERS · Chapter 763 — Hotels and Other Lodging
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 44-4 (2026)

Maintenance of transaction records

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The operator of each hotel, motel, inn or similar lodging shall maintain a record-keeping system of all guest transactions and receipts. All records maintained pursuant to this section shall be retained by the operator of such hotel, motel, inn or similar lodging for not less than six months from the date of creation of the record.

(P.A. 16-71, S. 3.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1993–2025 · leading case: State v. Collins, 10 A.3d 1005 (Conn. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Collins, 10 A.3d 1005 (Conn. 2011). · cites it 4× “" [33] The trial court then appointed the defendant's former attorney to serve as his standby counsel; see Practice Book §§ 44-4 [34] and 44-5; [35] and confirmed the defendant's understanding that standby counsel would be present to assist him if requested.”
State v. Guitard, 765 A.2d 30 (Conn. App. Ct. 2001). · cites it 4× “The language and application of Practice Book §§ 962 through 964 [now §§ 44-4 and 44-5] are based on United States Supreme Court precedent and, accordingly, meet *536 constitutional standards.”
State v. Connor, 973 A.2d 627 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 2× “Lorenzen was appointed to serve as standby counsel pursuant to Practice Book § 44-4. 8 At the next hearing, on December 15,2005, the defendant was completely unresponsive to questioning by Judge Miaño, who noted that the defendant had his head in his lap and appeared to be…”
State v. Jordan, 44 A.3d 794 (Conn. 2012). · cites it 3× “I conclude that the court should either dismiss [Schipul] as [the] defendant's counsel and allow [the] defendant to file pro se [Practice Book § 44-3] or appoint a special public defender as counsel or standby counsel [Practice *823 Book § 44-4]." [3] Schipul asked the court to…”
State v. J.M.F., 154 A.3d 1 (Conn. App. Ct. 2017). · cites it 3× “The defendant told the court that he would like a special public defender appointed pursuant to Practice Book § 44-4. He explained that, although he has "a cordial relationship" with current counsel, he was not communicating with them and wanted a different attorney.”
State v. Fernandez, 758 A.2d 842 (Conn. 2000). · cites it 2× “” Practice Book §§44-4 and 44-5 respectively cover the procedure for appointing and the role of standby counsel.”
Ross v. Comm'r of Corr., 217 Conn. App. 286 (Conn. App. Ct. 2023). · cites it 2× “Pursuant to Practice Book § 44-4,9 the court has dis- cretion to appoint standby counsel for self-represented defendants in criminal matters.”
Wilson v. Comm'r of Corr., 932 A.2d 481 (Conn. App. Ct. 2007). · cites it 2× “Practice Book § 44-4. That section provides in relevant part that “the judicial authority may appoint standby counsel .”
State v. Jordan, 984 A.2d 1160 (Conn. App. Ct. 2009). “Practice Book § 44-4].” 5 The defendant asked Ringor a series of questions outside the presence of the jury regarding Ringor’s knowledge of any lawsuit connected with the accident, conversations he had with attorneys and insurance agents, and ownership of the car Ringor was…”
State v. Owens, 235 Conn. App. 482 (Conn. App. Ct. 2025). “See Practice Book § 44-4. The defendant represented himself at all times thereafter, including at the probation revocation hearing.”
State v. Mark T., 199 A.3d 35 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018). “1 The defendant refused court-appointed counsel, but the court ultimately assigned the defendant standby counsel in accordance with Practice Book § 44-4. Before trial, the state filed, among other things, a motion in limine requesting that the name, address, and any other…”
Mimms v. Plan. Zoning Comm'n, Westport, No. Cv 0289405 S (Jun. 11, 1993), 1993 Conn. Super. Ct. 5731 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1993). · cites it 2× “If the Planning and Zoning Director finds any of the following requirements not applicable for small scale projects, such items may be waived pursuant to Section 44-4." 1. With respect to the plaintiffs' claim that the town failed to submit an archeological report, section 44-2 .”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.