Any court of probate, after the removal of any fiduciary and the appointment of a successor fiduciary, may enforce the delivery to the successor fiduciary of any estate held by the former fiduciary by virtue of his original appointment in the same manner as a court of equity might do.
(1949 Rev., S. 7042; P.A. 80-476, S. 195.)
History: P.A. 80-476 rephrased provisions but made no substantive changes; Sec. 45-265 transferred to Sec. 45a-244 in 1991.
See Sec. 45a-199 for definition of “fiduciary”.
Annotations to former section 45-265:
Cited. 70 C. 375; 73 C. 436; 77 C. 70; 80 C. 466. Failure to obey order to deliver assets to successor is breach of bond. 120 C. 181. Cited. 147 C. 482.
Cited. 6 CA 530.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2013–2020 · leading case:
Tunick v. Tunick, 242 A.3d 1011 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020).
Tunick v. Tunick, 242 A.3d 1011 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020).
· cites it 2× “all the powers available to a judge of the Superior Court at law and in equity pertaining to matters under this section.’’ Furthermore, parties to proceedings before the Probate Court, such as the plaintiff, retain the right to appeal from any ‘‘order, denial or decree of a…”
Holth v. Chelsea Groton Bank, 71 A.3d 597 (Conn. App. Ct. 2013).
· cites it 2× “” In response, the plaintiffs argued that the relevant portion of the Fiduciary Powers Act, specifically General Statutes § 45a-244 (2), did not apply in this case because it was not incorporated by reference or adopted verbatim in the trust indentures as required by General…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.