Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-70a (2026)

Judicial Branch equal employment opportunities plan. Compliance by Judicial Branch and Criminal Justice Commission

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The Judicial Branch shall develop and implement an equal employment opportunities plan pursuant to federal law that commits the Judicial Branch to a program of equal employment opportunities in all aspects of personnel and administration. The Chief Court Administrator shall be responsible for developing, implementing and filing the plan with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities.

(b) The Judicial Branch shall comply with the provisions of subsection (b) of section 46a-68, section 46a-68g, subsections (a), (b) and (c) of section 46a-70, subsections (a), (b) and (d) of section 46a-71, subsections (a) and (c) of section 46a-77, subsections (a), (b) and (c) of section 46a-81h and section 46a-81i.

(c) The Criminal Justice Commission shall comply with the provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of section 46a-68, sections 46a-68g, 46a-70 and 46a-71, subsections (a) and (c) of section 46a-77 and sections 46a-81h and 46a-81i.

(P.A. 84-435, S. 5, 6; P.A. 06-152, S. 11.)

History: P.A. 84-435 effective July 1, 1985; P.A. 06-152 replaced former provisions with Subsec. (a) re judicial branch equal employment opportunities plan, Subsec. (b) re compliance by judicial branch and Subsec. (c) re compliance by Criminal Justice Commission, effective June 6, 2006.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: Jobe v. Comm'r of Corr., 334 Conn. 636 (Conn. 2020).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jobe v. Comm'r of Corr., 334 Conn. 636 (Conn. 2020). · cites it 2× “06-152, § 3; and General Statutes § 46a-70a, which requires the Judicial Branch to develop and implement an equal employment opportunities plan pursuant to federal law.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.