(a) All state agencies shall cooperate with the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities in their enforcement and educational programs.
(b) All state agencies shall comply with the commission's request for information concerning practices inconsistent with the state policy against discrimination and shall consider its recommendations for effectuating and implementing that policy.
(c) Each state agency shall comply in all of its services, programs and activities with the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 USC 12101) to the same extent that it provides rights and protections for persons with physical or mental disabilities beyond those provided for by the laws of this state.
(d) The commission shall continue to augment its enforcement and education programs which seek to eliminate all discrimination.
(1969, P.A. 790, S. 9; P.A. 80-422, S. 25; P.A. 01-28, S. 9.)
History: P.A. 80-422 divided section into Subsecs. and made minor changes in wording; Sec. 4-61j transferred to Sec. 46a-77 in 1981; P.A. 01-28 added new Subsec. (c) requiring state agencies to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and redesignated existing Subsec. (c) as Subsec. (d).
Notes of Decisions
Curry v. Allan S. Goodman, Inc., 944 A.2d 925 (Conn. 2008).
· cites it 2× “01-28, § 9 (adding subsection [c] to General Statutes § 46a-77, requiring that state agencies comply with ADA “to the same extent that it provides rights and protections for persons with physical or mental disabilities beyond those provided for by the laws of this state”).”
In re Elijah C., 165 A.3d 1149 (Conn. 2017).
· cites it 2× “related statutes to strengthen protections for the disabled in accordance with the ADA itself.”
Paschal-Barros v. Quiros (D. Conn. 2022).
· cites it 9× “(g) State law claims pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-77 against DOC, DMHAS, and the DMHAS Commissioner in their official capacities.”
Jones v. Schortman (D. Conn. 2023).
· cites it 7× “§ 46a-63(2), Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-71, and Conn. Gen.”
Goode v. Salius (D. Conn. 2024).
· cites it 5× “Connecticut General Statutes § 46a-64 and § 46a-77 Plaintiff alleges violations of Conn.”
Jones v. Baran (D. Conn. 2023).
· cites it 3× “(3) Plaintiff may also PROCEED with his ADA/Rehabilitation Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-71, and Conn. Gen.”
Paschal-Barros v. Rosenberg (D. Conn. 2022).
“§46a-69 and §46a-77(c) against both defendants in their official capacities, for damages, based on allegations that they refused to treat plaintiff because of his mental disabilities.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-77(c) — 5 cases
Paschal-Barros v. Quiros (D. Conn. 2022).
“(g) State law claims pursuant to Conn. Gen. Stat. §46a-77 against DOC, DMHAS, and the DMHAS Commissioner in their official capacities.”
Goode v. Salius (D. Conn. 2024).
“Connecticut General Statutes § 46a-64 and § 46a-77 Plaintiff alleges violations of Conn.”
Paschal-Barros v. Rosenberg (D. Conn. 2022).
“§46a-69 and §46a-77(c) against both defendants in their official capacities, for damages, based on allegations that they refused to treat plaintiff because of his mental disabilities.”
Jones v. Schortman (D. Conn. 2023).
“§ 46a-63(2), Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-71, and Conn. Gen.”
Jones v. Baran (D. Conn. 2023).
“(3) Plaintiff may also PROCEED with his ADA/Rehabilitation Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46a-71, and Conn. Gen.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.