Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-126 (2026)

(Formerly Sec. 51-307). Secure facilities for care and treatment of children

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 46b-126 is repealed, effective July 1, 2018.

(1971, P.A. 170; P.A. 76-194, S. 4; 76-436, S. 17, 681; P.A. 77-326; 77-452, S. 23, 72; P.A. 79-581, S. 2; P.A. 83-402, S. 1; P.A. 84-252; P.A. 86-185, S. 1; P.A. 89-273, S. 2; P.A. 90-136, S. 1; 90-187, S. 1, 3; P.A. 93-91, S. 1, 2; P.A. 95-225, S. 39; P.A. 18-31, S. 43.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 21 cases, 1983–2014 · leading case: In re Ralph M., 559 A.2d 179 (Conn. 1989).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In re Ralph M., 559 A.2d 179 (Conn. 1989). · cites it 19× “” Even if he were susceptible to the mandatory transfer provision of § 46b-127 (1), the respondent further claims that the court erred in ordering his transfer because: (1) its finding of probable cause was based on certain statements that were improperly admitted into evidence;…”

In re Juv. Appeal (85-AB), 488 A.2d 778 (Conn. 1985). · cites it 13× “The court granted the motion of the state to transfer the case to the regular criminal docket pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-126. 1 The defendant *305 has appealed the transfer order, claiming error in the failure of the court to conduct a full evidentiary hearing to…”

State v. Torres, 538 A.2d 185 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 11× “General Statutes §§ 46b-126, 46b-127. The state argued to the trial court that a subsequent hearing for probable cause was unnecessary since the defendant had already had a probable cause hearing prior to his transfer.”

State v. Kelley, 537 A.2d 483 (Conn. 1988). · cites it 4× “General Statutes §§ 46b-126, 46b-127. “[Practice Book] Sec.”

In re Tyvonne M., 558 A.2d 661 (Conn. 1989). · cites it 6× “General Statutes §§ 46b-126 and 46b-127. Another prerequisite to such a transfer, however, is that the child must have committed the offense after attaining the age of fourteen.”

In re Michael S., 784 A.2d 317 (Conn. 2001). · cites it 5× “to 1981) § 46b-126 5 was a final judgment for the purposes of appeal.”

In re Daniel H., 678 A.2d 462 (Conn. 1996). · cites it 2× “’ See also General Statutes § 46b-126.” In re Bromell G.”

State v. Boyd, 570 A.2d 1125 (Conn. 1990). · cites it 2× “To achieve pretrial review of a finding of probable cause, the legislature might well have provided for it, as it is their prerogative to define our jurisdiction. Conn.”

In re Keijam T., 602 A.2d 967 (Conn. 1992). · cites it 2× “The state filed a simultaneous motion for transfer pursuant to General Statutes § 46b-126. That statute provides for transfer, under specified circumstances, to the regular criminal docket of children over the age of fourteen who are charged with certain serious juvenile…”

In re Prudencio O., 643 A.2d 265 (Conn. 1994). · cites it 4× “General Statutes §§ 46b-126, 46b-127 and 46b-145.”

Burns v. Bennett, 595 A.2d 877 (Conn. 1991). · cites it 2× “As an alternative to stating in an affidavit that good defenses exist and specifying the nature of those defenses, Practice Book § 572 (2) (b) also pro *167 vides that a defendant may obtain a transfer from the Small Claims division by stating in an affidavit that he is claiming…”

State v. Belcher, 721 A.2d 899 (Conn. App. Ct. 1998). · cites it 4× “to 1995) § 46b-126 (a) 8 (repealed by Pub- *121 lie Acts 1995, No.”

Show all 21 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.