Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 46b-15c (2026)

Out-of-court testimony in family relations matter when one party is subject to a protective order, restraining order or standing criminal protective order. Videoconference hearings permitted. Oaths. Cross-examination. Notice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In any court proceeding in a family relations matter, as defined in section 46b-1, the court shall, upon the written request of a party or the attorney for any party made not less than two days prior to such proceeding, order that the testimony of a party or a child who is a subject of the proceeding be taken outside the physical presence of any other party if a protective order, restraining order or standing criminal protective order has been issued on behalf of the party or child, and the other party is subject to the protective order, restraining order or standing criminal protective order. Such order may provide for the use of alternative means to obtain the testimony of any party or child, including, but not limited to, the use of a secure video connection for the purpose of conducting hearings by videoconference. Such testimony may be taken in a room other than the courtroom or at another location outside the courthouse or outside the state. The court shall provide for the administration of an oath to such party or child prior to the taking of such testimony in accordance with the rules of the Superior Court.

(b) Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit any party's right to cross-examine a witness whose testimony is taken in a room other than the courtroom pursuant to an order under this section.

(c) An order under this section may remain in effect during the pendency of the proceedings in the family relations matter.

(d) A notice describing the provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall be (1) posted on the Internet web site of the Judicial Branch, (2) included in any written or electronic form that describes the automatic orders in cases involving a dissolution of marriage or legal separation under section 46b-40, and (3) included in any written or electronic form provided to a person who receives a protective order under section 46b-38c, a standing criminal protective order under section 53a-40e or a restraining order, under section 46b-15.

(P.A. 08-67, S. 1; P.A. 10-144, S. 11; P.A. 21-78, S. 3; P.A. 24-24, S. 31.)

History: P.A. 08-67 effective July 1, 2008; P.A. 10-144 amended Subsec. (a) to substitute “standing criminal protective order” for “standing criminal restraining order”; P.A. 21-78 amended Subsec. (a) to require a court order on written request of a party or attorney for any party made not less than 2 days prior to such proceeding, and added Subsec. (d) re notice; P.A. 24-24 substituted “53a-40e” for “54a-40e” in Subsec. (d).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2022 · leading case: State v. Fernando a., 981 A.2d 427 (Conn. 2009).
State v. Fernando a., 981 A.2d 427 (Conn. 2009). · cites it 4× “08-67, § 1, codified at General Statutes § 46b-15c (authorizing court to order sworn testimony in family relations matter by party or child who is subject of protective order, when other party is subject of protective order, to be taken via videoconference technology with…”
L. D. v. G. T., 210 Conn. App. 864 (Conn. App. Ct. 2022). · cites it 2× “Although § 46b-15 does not explicitly provide a right to cross- examine witnesses during a hearing on an application for relief from abuse, General Statutes (Rev.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.