Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-59 (2026)
Overseer of Indians
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 47-59 is repealed.
(1949 Rev., S. 7168; 1961, P.A. 304, S. 6.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1976–1996 · leading case: Romanella v. Hayward, 933 F. Supp. 163 (D. Conn. 1996).
Romanella v. Hayward, 933 F. Supp. 163 (D. Conn. 1996). “See also Conn.Gen.Stat. § 47-59(a) (stating that “all resident Indians .”
Schaghticoke Indians of Kent, Connecticut, Inc. v. Potter, 587 A.2d 139 (Conn. 1991). “The predecessor of General Statutes § 47-59 in effect in 1953 gave the welfare commissioner responsibility over the Schaghticoke Indians.”
Rolling Cloud v. Gill, 412 F. Supp. 1085 (D. Conn. 1976). “Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 47-59b(a). Prior to the creation of this Council, Indian activities in Connecticut were confided exclusively to the state Commissioner of Welfare.”
Schaghticoke Indians of Kent v. Potter, 577 A.2d 719 (Conn. App. Ct. 1990). “304, 9 which replaced former General Statutes § 47-59, provided in relevant part: “The welfare commissioner shall have the care and management of lands and buildings on reservations and the general care and management of all persons residing on such reservations.”
— Conn. Gen. Stat. § 47-59(a) — 1 case
Romanella v. Hayward, 933 F. Supp. 163 (D. Conn. 1996). “See also Conn.Gen.Stat. § 47-59(a) (stating that “all resident Indians .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.