Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 5-152 (2026)

Short title: State Employees Retirement Act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter is known and shall be cited as the “State Employees Retirement Act”.

(1961, P.A. 234, S. 1.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1980–2024 · leading case: Bouchard v. State Emps. Ret. Comm'n, 178 A.3d 1023 (Conn. 2018).
Bouchard v. State Emps. Ret. Comm'n, 178 A.3d 1023 (Conn. 2018). · cites it 4× “I At the time the plaintiffs commenced the underlying administrative proceedings, neither the State Employees Retirement Act (act), General Statutes § 5-152 et seq., nor regulations promulgated thereunder prescribed a time limitation for filing a claim for retirement benefits or…”
Poole v. City of Waterbury, 831 A.2d 211 (Conn. 2003). · cites it 2× “406 , the issue was whether state employees had a vested, contractual right to benefits under the State Employees Retirement Act, General Statutes § 5-152 et seq. Our decision therein resolving that question in the negative was predicated on the absence of express language in…”
Pineman v. Oechslin, 488 A.2d 803 (Conn. 1985). · cites it 3× “The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether state employees have contractual interests in the State Employees Retirement Act (act), General Statutes §§ 5-152 through 5-192x.”
Longley v. State Employees Ret. Comm'n, 931 A.2d 890 (Conn. 2007). · cites it 2× “Under the State Employees Retirement Act (act), General Statutes § 5-152 et seq., state employees who retire after ten or more years of state service are entitled to retirement income based on the length of their state service and their “base salary,” which is defined as the…”
Walenski v. Connecticut State Employees Ret. Comm'n, 197 A.3d 443 (Conn. App. Ct. 2018). · cites it 4× “The present appeal involves a rather tangled procedural history that arose when the plaintiff, the second wife of a former state employee, Walter Walenski (Walter), was denied certain spousal retirement benefits in accordance with the State Employees Retirement Act (act),…”
Cochran v. Dept. of Transp., 350 Conn. 844 (Conn. 2024). · cites it 2× “13 In summary, we agree with the board that § 31-307 (a) ‘‘imposes no constraints on a claimant’s ability to collect temporary total disability benefits due to age or retirement status’’ and hold that a claimant who sustains a compensable injury under the act is eligible to…”
Starks v. Univ. of Connecticut, 850 A.2d 1013 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 5-152 et seq. General Statutes (Rev.”
Pineman v. Oechslin, 494 F. Supp. 525 (D. Conn. 1980). · cites it 2× “1 In that case, decided in 1974, Chief Judge Clarie held invalid the provisions of the Connecticut State Employees Retirement Act, Conn. Gen.Stat. § 5-152 et seq., which required male employees of the state to work five years longer to earn pension benefits than similarly…”
Travelers Ins. v. Pondi-Salik, 817 A.2d 663 (Conn. 2003). · cites it 2× “Additionally, the statutes surrounding § 5-192p provide for various types of retirement benefits: General Statutes § 5-192n provides for hazardous duty retirement; General Statutes § 5-192o provides for deferred vested retirement; General Statutes § 5-192q provides for optional…”
Crandle v. Connecticut State Employees Ret. Comm'n, 342 Conn. 67 (Conn. 2022). · cites it 3× “The principal issue in this appeal is whether the State Employees Retirement Act (act), General Statutes § 5-152 et seq., requires the state to commence payment of state employee disability retire- ment benefits on the day after the employee’s last day of paid employment or,…”
LoPresto v. State Employees Ret. Comm'n, 662 A.2d 738 (Conn. 1995). · cites it 2× “The act may be found at chapter 66 of the General Statutes, §§ 5-152 through 5-192x. General Statutes § 4-176 provides in pertinent part: “(a) Any person may petition an agency, or an agency may on its own motion initiate a proceeding, for a declaratory ruling as to the validity…”
St. George v. Mak, 842 F. Supp. 625 (D. Conn. 1993). · cites it 2× “Special deputy sheriffs shall be sworn to the faithful performance of their duties and, having been so sworn, shall have all the powers of the sheriff as provided by law, except as to service of civil process; and such special deputies shall continue to hold their office as long…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.