Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 50a — INTERNATIONAL LAW · Chapter 862 — UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 50a-109 (2026)

Arbitration agreement and interim measures by court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Unless otherwise provided in the arbitration agreement, it is not incompatible with an arbitration agreement for a party to request from a court, before or during arbitral proceedings, an interim measure of protection and for a court to grant such measure.

(P.A. 89-179, S. 9.)

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2007–2017 · leading case: Bahrain Telecomm. Co. v. Discoverytel, Inc., 476 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D. Conn. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bahrain Telecomm. Co. v. Discoverytel, Inc., 476 F. Supp. 2d 176 (D. Conn. 2007). · cites it 8× “” Conn. Gen. Stat. § 50a-109. This statute supports Plaintiffs’ argument that the Connecticut General Assembly sanctioned provisional remedies by Connecticut courts in cases such as this one.”
Everspeed Enter. Ltd. v. Skaarup Shipping Int'l, 754 F. Supp. 2d 395 (D. Conn. 2010). · cites it 3× “Conn. Gen.Stat. §§ 50a-109, 52-422. Section 50a-109 of the Connecticut General Statutes provides that “[ujnless otherwise provided in the arbitration agreement, it is not incompatible with an arbitration agreement for a party to request from a court, before or during arbitral…”
SCL Basilisk AG v. Agribusiness United Savannah Logistics LLC, 875 F.3d 609 (11th Cir. 2017). · cites it 2× “Instead, section 9-9-30 simply confirms that a party’s request to have a court order an interim measure already within its legal arsenal is compatible with that party’s desire to submit the merits of the dispute to arbitration. 24 24 A number of other states have adopted a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.