Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 51 — COURTS · Chapter 883a — Reporter of Judicial Decisions
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 51-215 (2026)

Publicly available briefs of all cases determined in Supreme Court and Appellate Court

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The chief clerk of the Supreme Court shall electronically provide to the State Library publicly available briefs of all cases determined in the Supreme Court and the Appellate Court, in a format and on a schedule that is mutually agreed to by the chief clerk of the Supreme Court and the State Librarian.

(1949 Rev., S. 1656; P.A. 82-248, S. 114; P.A. 90-234, S. 6, 8; P.A. 17-99, S. 9.)

History: P.A. 82-248 reworded section and “county law library” changed to “law library under the supervision of the state library board”; P.A. 90-234 amended section to make technical change, deleting reference to “state library board” and substituting “office of the chief court administrator”; P.A. 17-99 deleted provisions re Reporter of Judicial Decisions to obtain sufficient number of records and briefs of all cases determined in Supreme Court, cause them to be bound with an index and send copy to State Library and each law library, and added provision re chief clerk of Supreme Court to electronically provide State Library publicly available briefs of all cases determined in Supreme Court and Appellate Court.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1974–1993 · leading case: Gimbel v. Bernard F. & Alva B. Gimbel Found., Inc., 347 A.2d 81 (Conn. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gimbel v. Bernard F. & Alva B. Gimbel Found., Inc., 347 A.2d 81 (Conn. 1974). · cites it 2× “See General Statutes § 51-215. 4 “‘[General Statutes] See.”
Weirich v. Weirich, 867 S.W.2d 787 (Tex. 1993). “976; Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 51-215; Del.Sup.Ct.R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.