Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-163a (2026)
Determination of the law of jurisdictions outside this state
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In determining the law of any jurisdiction or governmental unit thereof outside this state, the court may consider any relevant material or source, including testimony, whether or not submitted by a party or admissible under the rules of evidence.
(b) The court, not the jury, shall determine the law of any jurisdiction or governmental unit thereof outside this state. Its determination is subject to review on appeal as a ruling on a question of law.
(P.A. 90-19, S. 1.)
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: State v. Reynolds, 836 A.2d 224 (Conn. 2003).
State v. Reynolds, 836 A.2d 224 (Conn. 2003). “Moreover, General Statutes § 52-163a expressly authorizes the courts of this state to determine the law of any jurisdiction outside this state.”
Kostrzewski v. Comm'r of Motor Vehs., 727 A.2d 233 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999). “The plaintiff cites General Statutes § 52-163a for the proposition that the trial court, in determining the law of a foreign jurisdiction, must find facts based on evidence presented at the hearing.”
E. I. du Pont de Numours & Co. v. Chemtura Corp. (Conn. App. Ct. 2024). “See General Statutes § 52-163a (a). But it is the plaintiff’s burden to prove the ‘applicable law’ under the APA, and the court will not speculate as to which code applies or attempt to determine the provi- sions of that code on its own.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.