Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-251b (2026)

Costs and attorney's fees in action for deprivation of civil rights

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(a) In any civil action to recover damages for injury to the person or to real or personal property arising out of a violation of section 46a-58, the court may allow the prevailing party his costs, together with a reasonable attorney's fee to be taxed by the court.

(b) The provisions of subsection (a) of this section shall not be deemed: (1) To create a new cause of action against any individual, the state or any municipality, or against any officer, official or employee of the state or any municipality; or (2) to confer any new jurisdiction upon the Superior Court in any action against any individual, the state or any municipality or any officer, official or employee thereof.

(P.A. 84-36, S. 1, 2.)

Cited. 204 C. 17; 216 C. 85.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1987–2004 · leading case: Doe v. State, 579 A.2d 37 (Conn. 1990).
Doe v. State, 579 A.2d 37 (Conn. 1990). · cites it 10× “See also General Statutes § 52-251a (allowing attorneys’ fees in a small claims matter transferred to regular docket); § 52-249 (allowing attorneys’ fees in an action for foreclosure).”
Doe v. Heintz, 526 A.2d 1318 (Conn. 1987). · cites it 6× “The court also drew upon the statutory analogy of General Statutes § 52-251b, which allows a reasonable attorneys’ fee to the prevail *27 ing party “[i]n any civil action to recover damages for injury to the person or to real or personal property arising out of a violation of…”
Ames v. Comm'r, 839 A.2d 1250 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 2× “ble attorney’s fees”), General Statutes § 14-145c (allowing “reasonable attorney’s fees” in action to recover damages for improper towing or removal of automobile by owner or lessee of private property), General Statutes § 52-240a (if court determines that claim or defense in…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.