Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 52 — CIVIL ACTIONS · Chapter 901 — Damages, Costs and Fees
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-262 (2026)

Fees for signing process, administering oaths, acknowledgments

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person legally authorized, except when otherwise provided and except for judges, prosecutors and clerks of court, shall be paid the following fees: (1) For signing an attachment, summons, warrant or subpoena, taking a bond or recognizance or an affidavit, or administering an oath out of court, ten cents; (2) for taking the acknowledgment of any instrument, or signing and issuing a subpoena or capias, twenty-five cents; and (3) for causing notices of the seizure of intoxicating liquors to be posted, or issuing an order for their destruction, fifty cents.

(1949 Rev., S. 3635; 1959, P.A. 473, S. 1; 1967, P.A. 628, S. 4; P.A. 82-160, S. 134.)

History: 1959 act doubled fee for issuing execution and deleted fees for drawing complaint and warrant for an informing officer, for each succeeding page and for issuing and issuing a mittimus; 1967 act excepted payment to judges, prosecutors and clerks and deleted fee for issuing execution; P.A. 82-160 rephrased the section and inserted Subdiv. indicators.

Cited. 196 C. 451.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Griffin Hosp. v. Comm'n on Hospitals & Health Care, 493 A.2d 229 (Conn. 1985).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Griffin Hosp. v. Comm'n on Hospitals & Health Care, 493 A.2d 229 (Conn. 1985). · cites it 2× “2d 1272 (1984), we determined that appeals certified pursuant to General Statutes § 52-265a are not subject to the final judgment restriction upon our jurisdiction imposed by General Statutes § 52-262. This federal standard is similar to the 1981 version of the Model State…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.