Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-299 (2026)

Attachment of partnership property for partner's debt

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When any action is brought to or is pending in the Superior Court, in which partnership property, or any interest therein, is attached to secure a claim against an individual partner only, any party to the action, or any member or members of such partnership, may file a complaint in the nature of a bill in equity in such court, which may, from time to time, make such order in the premises, either by granting an injunction, appointing a receiver, directing as to the disposition of the partnership property, the collection of the partnership debts and the application of the partnership funds, or otherwise, as to equity appertains.

(1949 Rev., S. 8071; P.A. 76-436, S. 405, 681.)

History: P.A. 76-436 removed actions in court of common pleas from purview of section, reflecting transfer of all trial jurisdiction to superior court, effective July 1, 1978.

Interest taken by such an attachment. 2 C. 516; 4 C. 542, 543; 10 C. 43; 13 C. 467; 14 C. 408; 21 C. 138. Cited. 58 C. 252; 68 C. 16. Provides a remedy for the attaching creditor to make his security available. 71 C. 706.

Cited. 21 CA 32.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)

(Return to
List of Chapters)

(Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1990–1996 · leading case: Wheeler v. Polasek, 571 A.2d 129 (Conn. App. Ct. 1990).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Wheeler v. Polasek, 571 A.2d 129 (Conn. App. Ct. 1990). · cites it 2× “During oral argument the plaintiff raised an issue concerning General Statutes § 52-299. Since that issue was neither raised at the trial nor briefed on appeal, we will not review it.”

O'Neil v. Miller (In Re Bridgeman), 197 B.R. 19 (Bankr. D. Conn. 1996). · cites it 13× “” Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 52-299 (West 1991). Two Superior Court rulings hold that § 52-299 authorizes a prejudgment remedy.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.