(a) A judgment creditor may obtain discovery from the judgment debtor, or from any third person the judgment creditor reasonably believes, in good faith, may have assets of the judgment debtor, or from any financial institution to the extent provided by this section, of any matters relevant to satisfaction of the money judgment. The judgment creditor shall commence any discovery proceeding by serving an initial set of interrogatories, in a prescribed form containing such questions as to the assets and employment of the judgment debtor as may be approved by the judges of the Superior Court or their designee, on the person from whom discovery is sought. Service of an initial set of interrogatories relevant to obtaining satisfaction of a money judgment of a small claims session of the Superior Court may be made by sending such interrogatories by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the person from whom discovery is sought. Questions contained in the interrogatory form shall be in clear and simple language and shall be placed on the page in such manner as to leave space under each question for the person served to insert such person's answer. Such person shall answer the interrogatories and return them to the judgment creditor within thirty days of the date of service. Interrogatories served on a judgment debtor shall be signed by such debtor under penalty of false statement. With respect to assets, the person served is required to reveal information concerning the amount, nature and location of the judgment debtor's nonexempt assets up to an amount clearly sufficient in value to ensure full satisfaction of the judgment with interest and costs, provided disclosure shall be first required as to assets subject to levy or foreclosure within the state. If interrogatories are served on a financial institution, the financial institution shall disclose only whether it holds funds of the judgment debtor on account and the balance of such funds, up to the amount necessary to satisfy the judgment.
(b) The interrogatory form shall specify the names and last-known addresses of the judgment creditor and the judgment debtor, the court in which and the date on which the judgment was rendered, and the original amount of the judgment and the amount due thereon. The interrogatory form shall contain a notice of rights with respect to postjudgment interrogatories as prescribed by section 52-361b.
(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this section, no party may compel disclosure of the names and addresses of clients of an individual or entity that provides professional services, as defined in subdivision (20) of section 4e-1, when the disclosure of such names and addresses would constitute a violation of state or federal law, or the applicable rules of professional conduct governing such profession, as the case may be.
(d) On failure of a person served with interrogatories to return, within the thirty days, a sufficient answer or disclose sufficient assets for execution, or on objection by such person to the interrogatories, the judgment creditor may move the court for such supplemental discovery orders as may be necessary to ensure disclosure including (1) an order for compliance with the interrogatories, or (2) an order authorizing additional interrogatories. The judgment creditor may obtain discovery, including the taking of depositions, from any person served with interrogatories in accordance with procedures for discovery in civil actions without further order of the court. The court may order such additional discovery as justice requires provided the order shall contain a notice that failure to comply therewith may subject the person served to being held in contempt of court.
(e) Any party from whom discovery is sought may seek a protective order pursuant to section 52-400a.
(P.A. 83-581, S. 7, 40; P.A. 84-527, S. 5; P.A. 85-346, S. 2; P.A. 97-86, S. 1; P.A. 01-186, S. 6; P.A. 24-108, S. 36.)
History: P.A. 84-527 amended Subsec. (a) by requiring interrogatories served on a judgment debtor to be signed under penalty of false statement and by rephrasing provision concerning the amount of a judgment debtor's assets the person served is required to reveal, and amended Subsec. (b) by deleting a provision requiring an interrogatory form to contain a notice of rights “If served on a judgment debtor who is a natural person”; P.A. 85-346 amended Subsec. (a) by adding provision re service of initial set of interrogatories by court clerk; P.A. 97-86 amended Subsec. (c) by deleting former Subdiv. (2) which had authorized the creditor to move for “an order for production or for examination of the judgment debtor or third person, provided any examination shall be conducted before the court”, designating as new Subdiv. (2) provision allowing the creditor to move for an order authorizing additional interrogatories, formerly part of Subdiv. (1), adding provision authorizing the judgment creditor to obtain discovery from any person served with interrogatories without further order of the court and authorizing the court to order such “additional” discovery as justice requires and making a technical change; P.A. 01-186 amended Subsec. (a) by eliminating provisions re service of initial set of interrogatories may be made upon request of judgment creditor and re payment of $5 by judgment creditor for each mailing requested and by making technical changes for purposes of gender neutrality; P.A. 24-108 added new Subsec. (c) re party not being able to compel disclosure of names and addresses of clients of an individual or entity that provides professional services when disclosure would violate state or federal law or applicable rules of professional conduct, redesignated existing Subsecs. (c) and (d) as Subsecs. (d) and (e) and made a technical change in redesignated Subsec. (d).
Cited. 240 C. 623.
Notes of Decisions
Presidential Capital Corp. v. Reale, 692 A.2d 794 (Conn. 1997).
· cites it 13× “The sole question in this certified appeal is whether General Statutes § 52-351b 1 provides a different rule, authorizing immedi *626 ate appellate review, in the event of a trial court’s denial of a protective order to shield a witness from discovery in statutory postjudgment…”
Abreu v. Leone, 968 A.2d 385 (Conn. 2009).
· cites it 5× “Thereafter, pursuant to § 52-351b (c) (2), to satisfy the judgment, the plaintiff filed postjudgment discovery petitions with the trial court, seeking permission to examine the defendant’s wife and son before a judge of the Superior Court regarding their knowledge of the…”
State v. Salmon, 735 A.2d 333 (Conn. 1999).
· cites it 2× “In affirming the Appellate Court’s determination that the lack of final judgment precluded the establishment of subject matter jurisdiction for review pursuant to General Statutes § 52-351b, we did not reach (he question of whether the appellants would have been considered…”
Krausman v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 195 Conn. App. 682 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020).
· cites it 15× “See General Statutes § 52-351b (granting trial court discretion with respect to imposing remedy for noncompliance).”
Alpha Beta Capital Partners, L.P. v. Pursuit Inv. Mgmt., LLC, 198 Conn. App. 671 (Conn. App. Ct. 2020).
· cites it 5× “On that same date, the plaintiff served postjudgment interrogatories on the defendants, in accordance with General Statutes § 52-351b (a). The defendants’ responses were due to the plaintiff on June 2, 2017.”
Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford Hosp., 157 A.3d 1125 (Conn. 2017).
· cites it 2× “The hospital did not and does not contend that, prior to moving for contempt, it pursued any of the postjudgment remedies that our legislature has authorized under chapter 906 of the General Statutes, including executing the award of costs; see General Statutes §§ 52-356a and…”
All Seasons Servs., Inc. v. Guildner, 878 A.2d 370 (Conn. App. Ct. 2005).
· cites it 4× “” General Statutes § 52-351b provides in relevant part: “(a) A judgment creditor may obtain discovery from the judgment debtor .”
Krausman v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 236 Conn. App. 109 (Conn. App. Ct. 2025).
· cites it 2× “In June, 2018, the plaintiff served the defendant with postjudgment interrogatories pursuant to General Stat- utes § 52-351b, seeking discovery on the defendant’s assets.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.