Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-71 (2026)

Process void if issued or served on Sunday

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Section 52-71 is repealed.

(1949 Rev., S. 7791; P.A. 76-415, S. 9; 76-435, S. 81, 82.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1964–2014 · leading case: Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co., 501 A.2d 1223 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985).
Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co., 501 A.2d 1223 (Conn. App. Ct. 1985). · cites it 2× “The process of filing a complaint based on a discriminatory practice is clearly outlined in General Statutes § 46a-83 (a) which provides in pertinent part that *647 “after the filing of any discriminatory practice complaint, the chairman of the commission shall refer the same to…”
Norwich Land Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 363 A.2d 1386 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 2× “The majority, however, have concluded that the plaintiff was not entitled to notice of the commission's order, and that the plaintiff's appeal period began on the date of the actual filing of the order, not on the date that a notice was sent to it.”
Souza v. Great Atl. & Pac. Tea Co., 199 A.2d 170 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1964). · cites it 2× “General Statutes § 52-71. The defendant further claims that service upon a foreign corporation may be made upon the resident attorney of such corporation appointed pursuant to General Statutes § 33-400 (formerly § 33-138) or, in the alternate, upon certain enumerated officers…”
Kim v. Emt (Conn. App. Ct. 2014). · cites it 3× “to 1975) § 52-71, the trial court correctly noted that any such prohibition was repealed more than thirty years ago.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.