Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 53 — CRIMES · Chapter 939 — Offenses Against the Person
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53-35 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 814c, Sec. 46a-64.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases, 1968–2004 · leading case: Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Bd. of Educ., 855 A.2d 212 (Conn. 2004). · cites it 20× “…however, to be available only for violations of § 46a-58 (formerly § 53-34), General Statutes § 46a-59 (formerly General Statutes § 53-35a), and General Statutes § 46a-64 (formerly General Statutes § 53-35). As we recognized in Truelove & Maclean, Inc., the reading given…”
Quinnipiac Council, Boy Scouts of Am., Inc. v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 528 A.2d 352 (Conn. 1987). · cites it 25× “” General Statutes § 53-35 (a). Violation of this section may give rise to penal sanctions as well as to civil remedies ordered as a result of administrative proceedings before the defendant commission.”
Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 514 A.2d 749 (Conn. 1986). · cites it 13× “(hereinafter Chestnut Realty), had discriminated against Barboza in violation of General Statutes § 53-35 (a) 1 by *352 refusing to sell him an unimproved building lot located in Woodbridge, because of his race.”
Evergreen Corp. v. Brown, 396 A.2d 146 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1978). · cites it 2× “He contends that the month-to-month tenancy agreement between himself and the plaintiff was illegal and void as against public policy because it was discriminatory and in violation of General Statutes § 53-35. He claims that the court could not give the plaintiff relief for any…”
City of Groton v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 362 A.2d 1359 (Conn. 1975). · cites it 2× “That this is so is confirmed by the fact that under § 53-36 the commission "may issue a complaint" on its own behalf only when it has reason to believe that § 53-35 or § 53-35a has been or is being violated, not when it has reason to believe that § 53-34 has been or is being…”
Real Est. Listing Serv., Inc. v. Connecticut Real Est. Comm'n, 425 A.2d 581 (Conn. 1979). “This listing is given to..........as listing agent, who will distribute and solicit the assistance of each member of E.”
Ziskis v. Kowalski, 726 F. Supp. 902 (D. Conn. 1989). · cites it 2× “Section 53-35 8 as a state law source for his entitlement to attend jai-alai exhibitions.”
City of Waterbury v. Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities, 278 A.2d 771 (Conn. 1971). “In addition, the commission, whenever it has reason to believe that section 53-35 or section 53-35a has been or is being violated, may issue a complaint.”
Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Cyril & Julia C. Johnson Mem'l Hosp., 294 A.2d 586 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1972). · cites it 2× “*7 In addition, the statute pertaining to discrimination in public accommodations, General Statutes § 53-35, would apply to the hospital as an “establishment, which eaters or offers its services or facilities or goods to the general public .”
Jones v. Foote, 338 A.2d 467 (Conn. 1973). “It is also claimed by the plaintiffs that courses of study comprising such curricula must be taught, and the public serviced by these schools, without discrimination and that there must be compliance with the public accommodations law, § 53-35. The plaintiffs Cornelia Jones and…”
Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Veneri, 244 A.2d 401 (Conn. 1968). · cites it 2× “The plaintiff instituted the present action alleging that the defendants, husband and wife, in violation of General Statutes § 53-35, as amended by No.”
Comm'n on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Carbone, 269 A.2d 92 (Conn. App. Ct. 1970). · cites it 2× “Jose (Rosita) Otero, because of her Puerto Rican ancestry, in the rental of an apartment unit in violation of § 53-35 of the General Statutes. Pursuant to § 53-36a, the plaintiff sought to have the defendant temporarily and permanently enjoined from renting the apartment unit to…”
Show all 13 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.