Connecticut General Statutes
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 54-102s (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official)
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Transferred to Chapter 969, Sec. 54-260.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
Secs. 54-102t to 54-102z. Reserved for future use.
| (Return to Chapter Table of Contents) |
(Return to List of Chapters) |
(Return to List of Titles) |
PART IIb
TESTING FOR TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1998–2009 · leading case: State v. Misiorski, 738 A.2d 595 (Conn. 1999).
State v. Misiorski, 738 A.2d 595 (Conn. 1999). “to 1997) § 54-102s. 1 We hold that it has such authority.”
State v. Kelly, 770 A.2d 908 (Conn. 2001). “to *87 1997) § 54-102s. 32 We agree that the trial court violated *88 the constitutional prohibition on ex post facto laws by sentencing the defendant to ten years probation following his prison term, but disagree that requiring the defendant’s registration as a sexual offender…”
State v. Fernando a., 981 A.2d 427 (Conn. 2009). “, dissenting) (applying Mathews factors in concluding that judicial hearing is required before probation officer may disclose defendant's criminal record to community pursuant to Megan's Law, General Statutes [Rev.”
State v. Hill, 773 A.2d 931 (Conn. 2001). “Whenever a sexual offender, as defined in section 54-102s, has violated the conditions of his probation by failing to notify his probation officer of any change of his residence address, as required by said section, such probation officer may notify any police officer that such…”
In re Darlene C., 717 A.2d 1242 (Conn. 1998). “Whenever a sexual offender, as defined in section 54-102s, has violated the conditions of his probation by failing to notify his probation officer of any change of his residence address, as required by said section, such probation officer may notify any police officer that such…”
State v. Boyle, 925 A.2d 1172 (Conn. App. Ct. 2007). “2d 595 , concerned whether the court properly upheld the authority of the office of adult probation to give notification to neighbors about that defendant's sexual assault conviction pursuant to General Statutes §§ 54-102s and 54-108. State v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.