Whenever the water pollution control authority is unable to agree with the owner of any property as to the compensation to be paid for the taking of such property, the water pollution control authority in the name of the municipality may, in the same manner specified for redevelopment agencies in accordance with sections
8-129 to
8-133, inclusive, determine such compensation and proceed in the acquisition and use of such property as provided therein.
(1949 Rev., S. 732; 1949, S. 315d; 1961, P.A. 517, S. 4; 1971, P.A. 870, S. 34; P.A. 76-436, S. 284, 681; P.A. 77-419; P.A. 78-154, S. 5.)
History: 1961 act removed obsolete reference to county treasurer, substituting state treasurer therefor; 1971 act substituted court of common pleas for superior court, effective September 1, 1971, except that courts with matters pending retain jurisdiction unless matters pending are transferable; P.A. 76-436 substituted superior court for court of common pleas, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 77-419 deleted provisions concerning determination of compensation by common pleas court when property owner and authority disagree and replaced them with provision for determination as for redevelopment agencies; P.A. 78-154 substituted water pollution control authority for sewer authority.
Decision that committee to assess damages be appointed, as distinguished from actual appointment of members of such committee, is not a final judgment from which appeal may be taken. 159 C. 421. Cited. 189 C. 710; 215 C. 197.
Cited. 2 CA 355.
Cited. 39 CS 454.
Notes of Decisions
Shelton Sewer Auth. v. Defilippo, 478 A.2d 623 (Conn. App. Ct. 1984).
· cites it 7× “In 1978, General Statutes § 7-248 was revised to provide that the amount of compensation to be paid for the taking of property may be determined in the same manner specified for redevelopment agencies in accordance with §§ 8-129 through 8-133.”
Altfeter v. Borough of Naugatuck, 732 A.2d 207 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999).
· cites it 2× “The plaintiffs’ convoluted amended complaint dated January 2, 1997, purports to allege the following wrongdoing against the borough: count one, breach of contract; count two, violation of the constitution of Connecticut, article first, § 8; count three, violation of the…”
French v. Town of Clinton, 575 A.2d 686 (Conn. 1990).
· cites it 2× “" Although § 8-132 applies by its terms only to condemnations by redevelopment agencies, the provision applies also to takings by municipal water pollution control authorities by virtue of General Statutes § 7-248, which provides that compensation for such takings shall be…”
Town of Branford Sewer Auth. v. Williams, 270 A.2d 546 (Conn. 1970).
“Section 7-248 of the General Statutes, under the provisions of which the plaintiff instituted this action, provides that when in such eminent domain proceedings the parties are unable to agree as to the compensation to be paid for the taking, the court or judge hearing the…”
Sewer Comm'n v. Norton, 316 A.2d 775 (Conn. 1972).
“The plaintiff brought this action praying that damages be appraised pursuant to § 7-248 of the G-eneral Statutes for the taking of certain land lying in the town of Colchester for a sewerage disposal plant.”
Town of Bristol v. Tucker, 466 A.2d 336 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1983).
· cites it 4× “This matter involves a sewer condemnation action which was commenced in March, 1975, pursuant to General Statutes § 7-248. On November 23, 1982, the trial court heard the matter and subsequently awarded the named defendant the sum of $250 as compensation for the sewer easement…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.