Conn. Gen. Stat. » Title 09 — ELECTIONS · Chapter 153 — Nominations and Political Parties
Connecticut General Statutes

Conn. Gen. Stat. § 9-381 (2026)

Nomination procedure

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section CT-CGAcga.ct.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The provisions of sections 9-382 to 9-450, inclusive, shall apply to the nomination by a major party of any candidate for an elective office, including an office established after the last-preceding election, and to the selection in any municipality by a major party of town committee members or delegates to conventions.

(June, 1955, S. 571d; November, 1955, S. N42; 1958 Rev., S. 9-73; 1963, P.A. 17, S. 9; 313, S. 2.)

History: 1963 acts restated previous provisions and substituted term “elective” for “public” office and provided for application of section to nominations of candidates to newly established offices.

(Return to Chapter
Table of Contents)		 (Return to
List of Chapters)		 (Return to
List of Titles)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1972–2016 · leading case: Price v. Indep. Party of CT, 147 A.3d 1032 (Conn. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Price v. Indep. Party of CT, 147 A.3d 1032 (Conn. 2016). · cites it 2× “to primaries held under the provisions of this chapter"); see also General Statutes § 9-381 (applying provisions of General Statutes §§ 9-382 through 9-450, which govern major parties, to "the nomination by a major party of any candidate for an elective office").”
Ajello v. Schaffer, 349 F. Supp. 1168 (D. Conn. 1972). “§§ 9-381 through 9-462 with Exhibit A of the aforementioned order of the Superior Court.”
Price v. Indep. Party of CT--State Cent. (Conn. 2016). · cites it 2× “to primaries held under the provisions of this chapter’’); see also General Statutes § 9-381 (applying provisions of General Stat- utes §§ 9-382 through 9-450, which govern major parties, to ‘‘the nomination by a major party of any candidate for an elective office’’).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.