(a) The primaries of all parties for nomination to an office to be voted upon at a state election shall be held on the second Tuesday in August in the year in which such state election is held.
(b) The primaries of all parties for nomination to an office to be voted upon at a municipal election shall be held on the fifty-sixth day preceding the day of the election.
(June, 1955, S. 577d; November, 1955, S. N49; 1957, P.A. 518, S. 4; 1958 Rev., S. 9-78; 1963, P.A. 17, S. 50; P.A. 74-25, S. 8, 13; P.A. 75-396, S. 1, 5; P.A. 03-241, S. 37.)
History: 1963 act restated previous provisions; P.A. 74-25 changed primary day for party whose candidate for governor polled higher number of votes at the last-preceding election to the fifty-fourth day preceding the day of election and for all other parties to the fifty-sixth day preceding the day of election, effective January 1, 1975 with respect to selection of town committee members and delegates to conventions; P.A. 75-396 changed primaries for all parties to the fifty-sixth day preceding the day of the election, effective January 1, 1976; P.A. 03-241 designated existing provisions as Subsec. (b), added Subsec. (a) re primary date for nomination to office to be voted upon at state election, and amended Subsec. (b) by limiting provisions to nomination to office “to be voted upon at a municipal election”, effective January 1, 2004, and applicable to primaries and elections held on or after that date.
Notes of Decisions
Caruso v. City of Bridgeport, 941 A.2d 266 (Conn. 2008).
· cites it 2× “Accordingly, in construing the phrase, we may consider the statute’s genealogy and its legislative history.”
Lazar v. Ganim, 334 Conn. 73 (Conn. 2019).
“deputy Democratic registrar of voters for the city; James Mullen, the head moderator for the primary election; Thomas Errichetti, the head moderator of absentee ballots for the primary election; Lydia Martinez, who, at the time that this action was brought, was the city clerk…”
Seymour v. Elections Enf't Comm'n, 762 A.2d 880 (Conn. 2000).
“wing duties and powers: “(1) To make investigations on its own initiative or with respect to statements filed with the commission by the Secretary of the State or any town clerk, or upon written complaint under oath by any individual, with respect to alleged violations of any…”
Gonzalez v. Surgeon, 937 A.2d 24 (Conn. 2007).
“provides: “Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-423, 9-425 or 9-464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who alleges that there has been a mistake in the count of the…”
Gonzalez v. Surgeon, 937 A.2d 13 (Conn. 2007).
“provides: “Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-423, 9-425 or 9464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who alleges that there has been a mistake in the count of the…”
Penn v. Irizarry, 600 A.2d 1024 (Conn. 1991).
“Any elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary as provided in section 9-423, 9-424,9-425 or 9-464 or who alleges that there has been a mistake in the count of the votes cast at such primary, or any candidate in such a…”
Simmons-Cook v. City of Bridgeport, 936 A.2d 601 (Conn. 2007).
“1 General Statutes § 9-329a provides: “(a) Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-423, 9-425 or 9-464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who alleges that there has been…”
Simmons-Cook v. City of Bridgeport, 936 A.2d 605 (Conn. 2007).
“provides: “(a) Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-423, 9-425 or 9-464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who alleges that there has been a mistake in the count of…”
Gonzalez v. Surgeon, 931 A.2d 833 (Conn. 2007).
“2 General Statutes § 9-329a (a) provides: “Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-423, 9-425 or 9-464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who alleges that there has been…”
Gonzalez v. Surgeon, 931 A.2d 835 (Conn. 2007).
“2 General Statutes § 9-329a (a) provides: “Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-423, 9-425 or 9-464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who alleges that there has been…”
Simmons-Cook v. City of Bridgeport, 941 A.2d 291 (Conn. 2008).
“1 General Statutes § 9-329a provides: “(a) Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-423, 9-425 or 9-464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who alleges that there has been…”
Caruso v. City of Bridgeport, 937 A.2d 7 (Conn. 2007).
““(a) Any (1) elector or candidate aggrieved by a ruling of an election official in connection with any primary held pursuant to (A) section 9-423, 9-425 or 9-464, or (B) a special act, (2) elector or candidate who alleges that there has been a mistake in the count of 1he votes…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.